<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-04-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3049" />
  <endPage num="3091" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Woolworths</name>
      <text id="20190402c2bd6f84bd894a3a80000166">
        <heading>Woolworths</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-04-02">
            <name>Woolworths</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-04-02T14:48:31" />
        <text id="20190402c2bd6f84bd894a3a80000167">
          <timeStamp time="2019-04-02T14:48:31" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:48):</by>  A further supplementary: what representations has the government made to Woolworths to try to avert any store closures in South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-04-02">
            <name>Woolworths</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-04-02T14:48:41" />
        <text id="20190402c2bd6f84bd894a3a80000168">
          <timeStamp time="2019-04-02T14:48:41" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:48):</by>  The honourable member's failed attempt at his first question was in relation to workers. The second attempt at a question was in relation to store closures. In relation to the first attempted supplementary question which was in relation to assistance for workers, we note, as I have just indicated, as I did yesterday, the clear statements by the company that they would work with all individual employees over the next two years—and this is something that is not happening today, it's going to happen in 2021—to try to find alternative employment opportunities.</text>
        <text id="20190402c2bd6f84bd894a3a80000169">If there is any evidence that they are not doing that, then that will be an opportunity for the government of the day to take up what would be a breach of an undertaking that they have given to the union and publicly at the time of this particular announcement. Unlike the Leader of the Opposition, we will take the company at its word in relation to the undertaking it has given to the union and to its workers and to the community. Unless there's evidence to the contrary, we will work on that premise.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>