<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-03-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2905" />
  <endPage num="2959" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Transport Subsidy Scheme</name>
      <text id="20190320b023fc06a66d490a80000266">
        <heading>Transport Subsidy Scheme</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-03-20">
            <name>Transport Subsidy Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-03-20T15:07:38" />
        <text id="20190320b023fc06a66d490a80000267">
          <timeStamp time="2019-03-20T15:07:38" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (15:07):</by>  Does the minister believe that the NDIS is providing adequate transport support to people living with a disability?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. Ridgway</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20190320b023fc06a66d490a80000268">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway:</by>  See if you can listen to the answer without talking.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20190320b023fc06a66d490a80000269">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Oh, the Hon. Mr Ridgway, you wish to answer the question? You seem very keen. Show some respect to your fellow ministerial colleague and don't point to the opposition. It's in breach of standing orders.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2019-03-20T15:07:57" />
        <text id="20190320b023fc06a66d490a80000270">
          <timeStamp time="2019-03-20T15:07:57" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (15:07):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. There are a range of areas in which people receive various supports within their packages. I think you can always put an argument that people can receive more or that some are adequate. Without examining the specific packages of each of those individuals, if she has examples of particular individuals who are not happy with what's in their plan, then we are more than happy, through my office, to take up those individual advocacy requests on behalf of those people and see what we can do for them. But it is hard to say in isolation, without examining the specific packages of support, whether they are adequate or not.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>