<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-03-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2855" />
  <endPage num="2903" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gene Technology</name>
      <text id="20190319cc8b9b9fee3a411b80000380">
        <heading>Gene Technology</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-03-19">
            <name>Gene Technology</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-03-19T16:20:58" />
        <text id="20190319cc8b9b9fee3a411b80000381">
          <timeStamp time="2019-03-19T16:20:58" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (16:20):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Health and Wellbeing a question about the South Australian government's position on the deregulation of new genetic modification techniques.</text>
        <text id="20190319cc8b9b9fee3a411b80000382">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="2881" />
        <text id="20190319cc8b9b9fee3a411b80000383">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL:</by>  As I outlined in my question to the minister last month on the same issue, I was advised that the federal government had asked the state representatives on the Legislative and Governance Forum on Gene Technology to sign off on the proposed regulatory changes to the federal Gene Technology Regulations by 11 March this year. The proposed changes, if approved, would deregulate a number of new GM techniques. My question of the minister is: as the South Australian representative on the Legislative and Governance Forum on Gene Technology, can the minister advise whether South Australia's position on the proposal has been decided and, if so, what that position is?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2019-03-19T16:21:54" />
        <text id="20190319cc8b9b9fee3a411b80000384">
          <timeStamp time="2019-03-19T16:21:54" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (16:21):</by>  The honourable member has raised this a number of times, and the honourable member is correct that the matter has been raised as an out-of-session item. But the matter hasn't been resolved, in spite of the fact that the date has passed. I think it's appropriate that, in the context of ministerial councils, we should let the processes of the ministerial council be concluded before we publicly debate them, because one of the issues is whether or not it's an appropriate matter for an out-of-session decision. It's my general view that decisions on contentious matters are best not made out of session because new material might come up, as well as, if you like, the simple binary vote. With all due respect to the honourable member, I don't intend to divulge the internal operations of the ministerial council.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>