<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-02-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2699" />
  <endPage num="2744" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Hibbert Review</name>
      <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000127">
        <heading>Hibbert Review</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-02-26">
            <name>Hibbert Review</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-02-26T14:47:07" />
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000128">
          <timeStamp time="2019-02-26T14:47:07" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:47):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Health and Wellbeing regarding the cluster of nine deaths subject to the Hibbert report.</text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000129">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000130">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  On 14 September 2018, now Premier Steven Marshall made the following comments during an address to the IPAA. The comments were:</text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000131">
          <inserted>Ministers must be ultimately responsible to the public through parliament for the quality of services funded by taxpayers and the actions of those providing them.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000132">
          <inserted>If serious errors or worse occur in an agency, the minister takes responsibility, particularly where there has been evidence of warnings or maladministration not acted upon or ignored.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000133">
          <inserted>I have told my ministers that they cannot expect to remain in cabinet if they see nothing, hear nothing and question nothing.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000134">
          <inserted>Ministers have to be inquisitive, inquiring and challenging.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000135">
          <inserted>Responsibility ends on the minister’s desk, not at the departmental door.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000136">My question to the minister is: </text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000137">1.&amp;#x9;Which minister is responsible for the Hibbert inquiry?</text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000138">2.&amp;#x9;Which minister is responsible for this cluster of nine deaths?</text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000139">3.&amp;#x9;When did the minister first inform the Premier that this was being investigated?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2019-02-26T14:48:21" />
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000140">
          <timeStamp time="2019-02-26T14:48:21" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (14:48):</by>  In terms of ministerial accountability, it is my responsibility to make sure that the health portfolio continues to strive to provide the best possible care for the people of South Australia. I was certainly keen to follow the independent review. The actions taken by SAAS, in my view, were completely appropriate. In fact, as far as I know, there was no systemic review in the previous Labor government. So to have an executive team, which was doing a case-by-case assessment of the cases, take immediate action but also initiate a systemic review, in my mind, was very good practice.</text>
        <text id="20190226a9289eb8a806496da0000141">Individual cases can bring forward, shall we say, more localised issues that need to be addressed, but what the Hibbert report shows is that, often by looking at individual cases, you can't see the broader issues that need to be addressed. I ask the council: looking at the Hibbert review, would any reasonable person think that the recommendations won't continue to enhance quality and safety in the Ambulance Service, and are to be welcomed?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>