<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-12-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2345" />
  <endPage num="2396" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Disability Justice Specialist Training Program</name>
      <page num="2379" />
      <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000703">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Disability Justice Specialist Training Program</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-10-25" qonNum="79">
            <name>Disability Justice Specialist Training Program</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000704">
          <inserted>79 <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) </by>(25 October 2018).  Can the Attorney-General advise:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000705">
          <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;What is the definition of a vulnerable witness in the Disability Justice Specialist Training Grant program?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000706">
          <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;How many witnesses required specialist interviewing skills in the period June 2015 to July 2018?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000707">
          <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;How many people left the pool of specialist interviewers in the period June 2015 to July 2018 and how were they replaced?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000708">
          <inserted>4.&amp;#x9;Where the current 150 specialist interviewers are employed now?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000709">
          <inserted>5.&amp;#x9;What consultation occurred before cutting this program?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000710">
          <inserted>6.&amp;#x9;Whether the Attorney-General is concerned that vulnerable witnesses will have poorer outcomes in the justice system as a result of this cut?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000711">
          <inserted>7.&amp;#x9;Whether the Attorney-General can guarantee that vulnerable witnesses will still be able to give evidence and that evidence will be admissible?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000712">
          <inserted>8.&amp;#x9;Whether the Attorney-General can guarantee that cases involving vulnerable witnesses will not experience additional delays?</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-10-25" qonNum="79">
            <name>Disability Justice Specialist Training Program</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000713">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer):</by>  The Attorney-General has provided the following advice:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000714">
          <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;Refer section 4 of the <term>Evidence Act 1929</term>.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000715">
          <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;Data is not available on the number of witnesses who have required specialist interviewing since 2015.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000716">
          <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;Data is not available on the movement of specialist interviewers since 2015. However, specialist interviewer training is undertaken by five agencies, being South Australia Police, the Department of Human Services, the Department of Education, SA Health and the Department for Child Protection. Between 2015 and 2018, 180 staff from these agencies completed the course. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000717">
          <inserted>4.&amp;#x9;There are currently 180 government employees who have completed the training. Of the current specialist interviewers: 103 are from SAPOL; four from the Department of Human Services; seven from the Department of Education; 43 from SA Health – Child Protection Services; and 23 from the Department for Child Protection.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000718">
          <inserted>5.&amp;#x9;The state budget is considered cabinet in confidence until budget day. Accordingly, this measure was not the subject of consultation with external stakeholders.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000719">
          <inserted>6.&amp;#x9;The five agencies approved now have sufficient capacity within their pool of trained staff to support forensic interviewing. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000720">
          <item>
            <inserted>7.&amp;#x9;Vulnerable witnesses will still have access to specialist interviewers. </inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201812044ecdf8d555ce45cc80000721">
          <item>
            <inserted>8.&amp;#x9;No delays are anticipated.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>