Legislative Council Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1) 54 1 Parliament of South Australia Legislative Council published Answers to Questions Electronic Court Management System Electronic Court Management System The Hon. K.J. MAHER Legislative Council Leader of the Opposition Electronic Court Management System 69 The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (25 October 2018). Can the Attorney-General advise: 1.	What has caused the additional expense and FTE requirement for the Electronic Court Management System (ECMS)? 2.	What work are the additional 15 FTEs doing on the ECMS? 3.	The salary and job title for each of those FTEs? 4.	How the additional funding is being spent? The Hon. R.I. LUCAS Legislative Council Treasurer Electronic Court Management System The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer): The Attorney-General has provided the following advice: This question appears to relate to the explanation of significant movements commentary for the Sub-Program 1.1 Criminal Jurisdiction. A similar commentary refers to Sub-Program 1.3 Civil Jurisdiction, therefore these two sub-programs should be combined in reference to the impact of ECMS. This impact has been outlined in previous responses.