<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-12-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2345" />
  <endPage num="2396" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Consumer and Business Services</name>
      <page num="2393" />
      <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001148">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Consumer and Business Services</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-10-25" qonNum="119">
            <name>Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001149">
          <inserted>119 <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) </by>(25 October 2018).  Can the Attorney-General advise:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001150">
          <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;Why is there a reduction in the percentage of investigations resulting in enforcement forecast for Consumer and Business Services?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001151">
          <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;Of a breakdown of data about investigations resulting in enforcement including what areas, what is the maximum and minimum amounts, what is the average payment time and are there outstanding payments from previous financial years?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001152">
          <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;Why didn't Consumer and Business Services meet their target of issuing 80 per cent of birth, death and marriage certificates within five days?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001153">
          <inserted>4.&amp;#x9;Why have Consumer and Business Services reduced their target for the number of birth, death and marriage certificates applied for online from 74 per cent in 2017-18 to 60 per cent in 2018-19?</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-10-25" qonNum="119">
            <name>Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001154">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer):</by>  The Attorney-General has provided the following advice:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001155">
          <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;The compliance and enforcement branch has improved workflows and developed a triage assessment and escalation process. This has resulted in an improvement in the percentage of investigations resulting in enforcement outcomes.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001156">
          <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;CBS prosecutions /disciplinary action, assurances, undertakings and inspections are outlined in detail in the Attorney-General's Department Annual Report. In 2017-18, CBS has reported 19 prosecutions, 38 assurances and undertakings, 28 expiations and 24 licence cancellations /suspensions. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001157">
          <inserted>There is one current court order requiring payment of costs to CBS as a result of the Commissioner for Consumer Affairs v LukeLeo Pty Ltd and Farrell. The court ordered payment of $10,000 within 28 days, followed by $2,000 per month over 25 months. CBS continues to receive these payments. There are no further outstanding payments.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001158">
          <inserted>CBS does not keep data on average payment times for penalties imposed by the courts.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001159">
          <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;The births, deaths and marriages section experienced a high turnover of staff in 2017-18 which necessitated a greater focus on training. Measures are now in place to improve this, as evidenced by 2018-19 first quarter statistics (81%). </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2018120421e697abc8ef46aeb0001160">
          <inserted>4.&amp;#x9;At the time of preparing the 2016-17 budget papers, the target figure was inadvertently published as 75%. This figure should have been 55%. In 2017-18 the target figure was 75% but should have been 60%.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>