<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-11-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2175" />
  <endPage num="2213" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Adelaide Oval Precinct</name>
      <text id="2018112719af0d47b7e748b980000133">
        <heading>Adelaide Oval Precinct</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-27">
            <name>Adelaide Oval Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-27T14:46:11" />
        <text id="2018112719af0d47b7e748b980000134">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-27T14:46:11" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (14:46):</by>  Supplementary: can the Treasurer tell us, have there been any expressions of interest or any discussions entered into with commercial operators to run the hotel and, if so, which ones?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-27">
            <name>Adelaide Oval Precinct</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-27T14:46:29" />
        <text id="2018112719af0d47b7e748b980000135">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-27T14:46:29" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:46):</by>  Again, minister Stephan Knoll has carriage of this but my understanding is that the Stadium Management Authority made it clear that they are going to operate the hotel themselves, and therefore the answer to the question is no. I don't know whether there were ever any discussions but the current proposal is that there would be no commercial operators operating the hotel. Therefore, to answer the question, 'Which ones?' there will be no commercial operators operating the hotel.</text>
        <text id="2018112719af0d47b7e748b980000136">I think I have seen media interviews where they have indicated that, within their body of existing management expertise, they have claimed that they have people either with the ability, experience or otherwise to manage a 128-bed hotel, or they will add that or augment their existing staffing to ensure they can operate a commercial hotel premises as part of their business. So the answer to the question is no, but if upon consultation with minister Knoll there is anything different to the answer, I will bring back a different response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>