<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-11-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2071" />
  <endPage num="2121" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Shanghai Trade Office</name>
      <text id="20181114a94e2a454fd04d8480000072">
        <heading>Shanghai Trade Office</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-14">
            <name>Shanghai Trade Office</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-14T14:28:11" />
        <text id="20181114a94e2a454fd04d8480000073">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-14T14:28:11" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (14:28):</by>  Why is the minister happy to condone his agency paying the rent on an office for seven staff when at the moment it's only employing one, and his ambition is only to increase it to a staff of two?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-14">
            <name>Shanghai Trade Office</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-14T14:28:25" />
        <text id="20181114a94e2a454fd04d8480000074">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-14T14:28:25" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment) (14:28):</by>  I find it strange, and that's why I am interested in the source of the honourable member's information for her question because I don't recall ever seeing a departmental brief with three staff from the SATC—from the three staff from the SATC. So I am interested in that.</text>
        <text id="20181114a94e2a454fd04d8480000075">The office—we have negotiated with Austrade a particularly good deal. There is room to expand. It won't hold seven people. I honestly don't know where the honourable member has got that information; I don't recall seeing it. It may have been in early discussions, but I certainly have no recollection, and I will be asking my department as to where—if that is a South Australian Department for Trade and Investment internal brief, I will be interested to know its source.</text>
        <text id="20181114a94e2a454fd04d8480000076">So we don't have an office for seven with one person. That's a ridiculous statement from the member opposite who seems to have, in the last few days, decided not to wear a tie anymore. I don't know whether he has had another accident with his soup or whether that is a new approach to the dress standards in this wonderful chamber.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>