<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-11-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1899" />
  <endPage num="1949" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
      <text id="2018110757e36016d19c47c490000150">
        <heading>Shop Trading Hours</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-07">
            <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-07T14:42:18" />
        <text id="2018110757e36016d19c47c490000151">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-07T14:42:18" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (14:42):</by>  Can the Treasurer advise the chamber how many other submissions had the header or the same generic salutation of 'Dear Treasurer'?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-07">
            <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-07T14:42:27" />
        <page num="1906" />
        <text id="2018110757e36016d19c47c490000152">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-07T14:42:27" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:42):</by>  I don't know, but as soon as question time finishes, or indeed tonight, I will spend plenty of time checking exactly what the salutations were. Again, the Hon. Mr Hunter, if what he is seeking to do indicates that that is in some way in and of itself sufficient to junk an email, he is misunderstanding again the techo advice I have shared. The mere use of a generic salutation in and of itself is not sufficient to junk a particular email; it is one of a number of indicators. The Hon. Mr Hunter can choose to delude himself, as indeed the Hon. Mr Maher can delude himself as well, that in some way, in and of itself, that particular salutation would junk something.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. Hunter</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2018110757e36016d19c47c490000153">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. Hunter:</by>  It's the one you picked.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2018110757e36016d19c47c490000154">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  Well, because I'm not going to put all of them on the public record. Why would I, on the public record, indicate all the levels so that those people who want to direct malicious emails to government can try to trash the systems? Why would I put all the security measures on the public record? I was just trying to help my good friends and colleagues within the shoppies union to assist them to get through the system in future: just say, 'Dear Rob, 'Dear Comrade' or 'Dear Minister Lucas', and, maybe if they want to, follow it up with a hard-copy letter.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>