<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-11-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1837" />
  <endPage num="1898" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ministerial Legal Action</name>
      <text id="201811063b835dde81d547da90000265">
        <heading>Ministerial Legal Action</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-06">
            <name>Ministerial Legal Action</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-06T15:23:51" />
        <text id="201811063b835dde81d547da90000266">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-06T15:23:51" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (15:23):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Has the Minister for Child Protection sought indemnification for the legal action she is currently bringing against the member for Badcoe, the shadow minister for child protection? Has that request, if made, been approved and, if so, to what quantum?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-06">
            <name>Ministerial Legal Action</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-06T15:24:09" />
        <text id="201811063b835dde81d547da90000267">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-06T15:24:09" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:24):</by>  No, not to my knowledge. I am not sure whether, if such an application was to be made, it would come to me or to the Attorney-General. In relation to the question, on my understanding—I don't have full line of sight of this issue—the general principles in relation to potential indemnification don't relate to actions that ministers take against others. They relate to indemnification if they are being sued as a result of statements they have made as ministers and they believe that they have been defamed.</text>
        <text id="201811063b835dde81d547da90000268">That was certainly the practice under the former government, it was certainly the practice under the former Liberal government and it is certainly going to be the practice under this Liberal government. If the actual case to which the honourable member is referring is where a minister of this government believes that they have been defamed by somebody else and they were instituting legal action they wouldn't be entitled to, and therefore they wouldn't seek indemnification from either me, the Attorney-General or indeed anybody else in the government.</text>
        <text id="201811063b835dde81d547da90000269">I am pretty confident that is an accurate summary of the position. If it is not, I will bring back further information to the honourable member, but I am pretty confident that is an accurate summation of the situation.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>