<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-11-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1837" />
  <endPage num="1898" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
      <text id="20181106423ab13726134abbb0000219">
        <heading>Shop Trading Hours</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-06">
            <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-06T15:09:27" />
        <text id="20181106423ab13726134abbb0000220">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-06T15:09:27" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (15:09):</by>  Supplementary: if upon checking, the Treasurer did discover that on Friday 5 October 2018 at 2.27pm he did in fact receive an email reply with an attached letter to his request for views about Christmas shop trading hours from the SDA, will he publicly apologise, in the same way that he has castigated the union in public in the media, and will he apologise for misleading the house if he did, in fact, receive a response at 2.27pm on Friday 5 October?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-06">
            <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-06T15:10:12" />
        <text id="20181106423ab13726134abbb0000221">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-06T15:10:12" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:10):</by>  I am always happy, if anything I indicate to the house subsequently proves to be incorrect, to immediately correct the record and apologise to those who might have been offended. The clear advice from my office, and from all of those who have been associated with collating the replies to the submission, was that no submission was received from the shoppies union.</text>
        <text id="20181106423ab13726134abbb0000222">As I said, not just in relation to this issue, I am a very reasonable man. If anything I indicate, either publicly or to the house, subsequently proved to be incorrect, I would immediately seek to correct the record and indeed, if I have offended anyone, apologise for that. As I said, that was the very clear and explicit advice, not only soon after the submissions closed but even recently, as I sought to make the final decision, because I thought there may well have been people who missed the deadline and submitted things after the deadline, including the shoppies union.</text>
        <page num="1849" />
        <text id="20181106423ab13726134abbb0000223">To be fair, I think there were probably one or two other stakeholders who did not reply or chose not to; they did not have to reply. It was an invitation to them to reply should they so choose. I inquired prior to making the decision to my office whether we had received any further submissions, and the clear advice I got was that no, we hadn't. As I said, I am a very reasonable person. If anything proves to be incorrect, I will correct the record as soon as I establish that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181106423ab13726134abbb0000224">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Supplementary, Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>