<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-11-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1837" />
  <endPage num="1898" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
      <text id="2018110602aaad8ff589439090000099">
        <heading>Shop Trading Hours</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-06">
            <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-06T14:38:15" />
        <text id="2018110602aaad8ff589439090000100">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-06T14:38:15" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (14:38):</by>  Supplementary: have there been any changes to the approval process for extended trading in the Sundays leading up to Christmas this year?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-11-06">
            <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-11-06T14:38:25" />
        <text id="2018110602aaad8ff589439090000101">
          <timeStamp time="2018-11-06T14:38:25" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:38):</by>  I am not sure I exactly understand the member's question. The approval process is governed by the legislation, so no, the legislation has not changed. We sought to change the legislation and the parliament defeated that. The legislation governs the approval process, so the broad legislative underwriting of this process has not changed.</text>
        <text id="2018110602aaad8ff589439090000102">On this particular occasion, in relation to Christmas trading hours I wrote to a range of the stakeholders, including the union bosses in the shoppies union, seeking their views in relation to Christmas trading hours. I received a range of submissions, but the union bosses from the shoppies union did not respond. I was quite clear: I knew the views of the union bosses of the shoppies union in relation to trading hours. From that viewpoint, the process wasn't really the approval process; it was the consultation process. It was slightly different.</text>
        <text id="2018110602aaad8ff589439090000103">I understand that possibly under the former Labor government the shoppies union and the union bosses might have had a much greater say or a veto power perhaps in terms of what they approved and what they didn't approve. Unsurprisingly, we are quite happy to consult the union bosses at the shoppies union, but we don't subscribe to the view that they control the new Liberal government in the same way they controlled the former Labor government.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>