<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-10-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1541" />
  <endPage num="1596" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000020">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Privatisation</name>
      <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000021">
        <heading>Privatisation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-10-17">
            <name>Privatisation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-10-17T14:19:09" />
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000022">
          <timeStamp time="2018-10-17T14:19:09" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:19):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Treasurer regarding privatisation.</text>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000023">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000024">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  Before the 1997 election, the then Liberal leader, John Olsen, stated, 'We are not pursuing a privatisation course with ETSA.' On ABC radio on 10 October 2017, not that long before this state election, the member for Dunstan and then Liberal leader of the opposition, Steven Marshall, said, 'We don't have a privatisation agenda.' My question is to the Treasurer. Will he explain why Liberal leaders, including the now Premier, Steven Marshall, continue to lie to the people of South Australia about privatisation and selling energy assets?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000025">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  That is a series of assertions. I am going to strike them out, but the Treasurer may wish to answer it, if he chooses; otherwise I will rule it out of order. Treasurer, do you wish to answer it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2018-10-17T14:20:08" />
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000026">
          <timeStamp time="2018-10-17T14:20:08" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:20):</by>  I am always happy to answer the question, even when the leader uses intemperate and unparliamentary language.</text>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000027">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. Maher interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000028">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Leader of the Opposition, it is unparliamentary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="1542" />
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000029">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  The last person in the world who ought to talk about, to use his phrase, that unparliamentary word that he used in relation to broken promises on privatisation, would be the Leader of the Opposition and the Labor Party.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. Maher</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000030">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. Maher:</by>  Answer the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000031">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  I am answering the question. Prior to the 2014 election, prior to the 2010 election—</text>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000032">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000033">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! Leader of the Opposition, order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000034">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  —the leader of the party said that they wouldn't privatise. Prior to 2002—</text>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000035">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000036">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Sit down, Treasurer, for a moment. Leader of the Opposition, he is responding to your question. Do him the courtesy of allowing him to respond to your question. I have done you the courtesy of allowing you to ask the question, even if it had inflammatory rhetoric and some additional rhetorical flourishes, which you know I do not like. Treasurer, continue.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000037">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  Indeed, inflammatory rhetorical flourishes, if I might be able to use the phrase. This is a Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council that represents the party that produced tens of thousands of pledge cards, which pledged, in 2002 and every election onwards, that they would not privatise. Let's just run through the list: the Labor Party—</text>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000038">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000039">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Leader of the Opposition, restrain your language.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000040">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  He doesn't like getting his own medicine back. He is a representative of a party who pledged they would not privatise. When his Premier was elected in 2002 he then subsequently signed pledges in front of the media cameras, an edict to all CEOs, that there will be no privatisation under a Labor government.</text>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000041">Let's run through them: the South-East forests—our forests in the South-East. The Hon. Mr Maher, the Hon. Ms Scriven, all of us understand the importance of the forests to the South-East of South Australia and Mount Gambier. Which was the government that privatised the forests? It was the Labor government, contrary to the promises that were made. The Lotteries Commission, the Motor Accident Commission—he doesn't like it when he gets his own medicine.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000042">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  Point of order: the question was directed at what the Liberal Party has done and their lies.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000043">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I am not upholding that point of order. You are not on high moral ground, Leader of the Opposition. Good try. The Treasurer, let's hear from you.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000044">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  Mr President, as you rightly pointed out, the inflammatory rhetorical flourishes of the Leader of the Opposition open this question up. I am very happy to respond in kind. The Lotteries Commission, the Motor Accident Commission, the Lands Titles Office. With a secret report that you paid $100,000 for, you tried to privatise SA Water. You had a secret report—$100,000 you spent on a secret report to try to privatise SA Water.</text>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000045">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000046">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Ms Lensink, please stop using props. You should know better as a minister.</text>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000047">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. Hunter interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000048">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Mr Hunter, you are stretching my patience. Please exercise restraint; you have outdone yourself. Treasurer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="1543" />
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000049">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  The Hon. Mr Hunter was indeed a minister for water at a time in a government where secretly they commissioned a $100,000 report as to how they could privatise SA Water. There isn't and wasn't an asset in the state that wasn't nailed down that they didn't try to privatise. What we found hidden in the secret deal in relation to the Lands Titles Office was their intention to privatise the motor registry division in South Australia without having told the people of South Australia. They actually took—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. Hunter</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000050">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. Hunter:</by>  What rubbish; absolute rubbish!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000051">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  The Hon. Mr Hunter says it's absolute rubbish. They took $80 million from the private sector consortium on the condition that they be given first mover advantage about the privatisation of the motor registry division. They took the cash and ran. They banked it. They spent it but they didn't tell the people of South Australia in relation to that particular asset.</text>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000052">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000053">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Please restrain yourself. You are stretching my patience.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017fbcb06136cc449b880000054">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  I love it when the Labor Party starts talking about privatisation and tries to pretend in some way that they are the anti-privatisation party. The people of South Australia heard that prior to the election and they threw them out of office. They threw them out of office because they heard the same rhetoric, they heard the same scare campaign about the privatisation agenda of the government, and they threw the Labor government out of office because they didn't believe the sort of rubbish that they heard prior to the election and they won't believe the same sort of rubbish after the election either.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>