<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-10-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1541" />
  <endPage num="1596" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Radiology Services</name>
      <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000193">
        <heading>Radiology Services</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-10-17">
            <name>Radiology Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-10-17T14:51:49" />
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000194">
          <timeStamp time="2018-10-17T14:51:49" />
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS (14:51):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Health and Wellbeing a question.</text>
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000195">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000196">
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS:</by>  In a state budget media release issued on 4 September, the minister indicated:</text>
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000197">
          <inserted>Efficiencies in public imaging and diagnostic services will be pursued. Previous external reviews have highlighted inefficiencies in SA Medical Imaging Services resulting in around a 30 per cent higher net cost compared to equivalent services interstate. It is anticipated that efficiencies of $1.1 million in 2018-19, rising to $6.2 million from 2021-22 will be achieved. External providers already deliver radiology services at the Modbury and Noarlunga Hospitals, and some services at Lyell McEwin Hospital and country hospitals. Should efficiencies not be achieved, the option open to the Local Health Network Boards to procure services from alternative providers will be pursued;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000198">My question to the minister is: if the requisite efficiencies in public imaging and diagnostic services are met, will the government categorically rule out the option for local health network boards to go to alternative providers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2018-10-17T14:53:09" />
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000199">
          <timeStamp time="2018-10-17T14:53:09" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (14:53):</by>  I will certainly provide further information to the member, because my recollection is that the Treasurer has already corresponded with stakeholders on this point, but let's be clear: in relation to both medical imaging and pathology, the concern of the government is making sure that South Australian taxpayers get value for money services that are input into their health care.</text>
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000200">We have a situation where one of our hospitals is more than 20 per cent above the average price for hospital services. That is completely unacceptable, because that means there are millions of dollars in inefficiencies and services that could be going into providing health care. The government's commitment is to drive efficiencies in public sector services. The commitment of the government is that local health boards would be able to go to alternative providers if the efficiencies can't be achieved within the public sector.</text>
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000201">The honourable member's question, of course, very deftly highlights the hypocrisy of the members opposite because, as she quite rightly highlights, the former Labor government, in spite of its rhetoric about privatisation, has been actively engaging private providers within the health system. In relation to medical imaging, as the honourable member says, Modbury Hospital, Noarlunga Hospital and parts of the Lyell McEwin services are already provided by private providers. They already provide it in Angaston, Bordertown, Ceduna, Gawler, Kangaroo Island, Millicent, Mount Barker, Mount Gambier, Naracoorte, Port Augusta, Port Lincoln, the South Coast, Wallaroo and Whyalla. But of course it doesn't stop there either.</text>
        <page num="1551" />
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000202">In relation to hotel services, most of the hotel services to metropolitan hospitals are already provided by the private sector. Considering the hypocrisy we have been hearing from the members on the other side of the chamber, the most dramatic shift towards private services in recent decades was under the former Labor government, when they established a $2.4 billion private hospital at the end of North Terrace, which we'll get back in about 30 years' time, after we've spent about $11 billion in payments to the private sector.</text>
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000203">The fact of the matter is that we make no apology for looking at private provision as an alternative to public provision, particularly if the public sector can't achieve efficiencies. In that respect, we're no different to the Labor Party.</text>
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000204">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20181017f266fe6558db401890000205">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Are we all finished? The Hon. Mr Wortley.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>