<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-09-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1315" />
  <endPage num="1371" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ambulance Services</name>
      <page num="1319" />
      <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000097">
        <heading>Ambulance Services</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5413" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. E.S. BOURKE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-09-18">
            <name>Ambulance Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-09-18T14:35:10" />
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000098">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-18T14:35:10" />
          <by role="member" id="5413">The Hon. E.S. BOURKE (14:35):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health and Wellbeing. Will the minister rule out additional risks to patient safety as a result of the government's privatisation of ambulance services between Modbury and Lyell McEwin hospitals, and will a degree-qualified paramedic be present during these transfers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Health and Wellbeing</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-09-18">
            <name>Ambulance Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-09-18T14:35:32" />
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000099">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-18T14:35:32" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (14:35):</by>  Inter-hospital transfers between Modbury and Lyell McEwin hospitals are yet another price that the people of South Australia are paying for the botched Transforming Health savings program. When former treasurer Koutsantonis wanted to have a response to a federal budget, what did they say? 'Okay, we've got a budget savings program. What will we do? We'll close three hospitals. We'll downgrade three emergency departments.' I would put it to you humbly, members—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000100">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Through me, minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000101">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  —our budget is much more responsible, much more measured. We're not saying, 'Let's do the quick and easy slash—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000102">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  Point of order: despite you having reminded the minister just then to direct his comments through you, he is wilfully ignoring the President of this chamber.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000103">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Thank you for your concern, the Hon. Mr Hunter. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000104">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  Thank you, Mr President. I assure you it was not wilful, and I shall keep doing it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000105">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Get on with the answer, minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000106">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  Thanks for the opportunity, the Hon. Mr Hunter, to gather my thoughts, and I might just restate them. What we have here are the long-term consequences of the former Labor government's response to how to make our health system sustainable. Faced by federal budget cuts, treasurer Koutsantonis—I think it was; they come and go—suggested that the best way to make ends meet was to close three hospitals and downgrade three emergency departments. One of them was the Modbury Hospital. They suggested that there would only be one or two transfers a day. I won't be held accountable for this—I will try to check it—but my recollection is that it was about ten times that.</text>
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000107">I am happy to take that on notice to give advice to the house on how much greater the hospital transfers were from Modbury to Lyell McEwin than were predicted by the former Labor government. The fact of the matter is they got so many stats wrong; this was just yet another example. What this government is faced with is a very large bill to transfer patients from Lyell McEwin to Modbury, and from Modbury to Lyell McEwin. I should say it's the health network. The health network came up with a strategy to have a more affordable transport service between Modbury and Lyell McEwin and back again by giving patient transport an appropriate level, which may not necessarily be a full ambulance service.</text>
        <text id="201809180298a2da69ec4f58a0000108">We think it makes sense to look to another provider if we can provide an appropriate service at a lower cost. This service will be focused on patients not requiring full ambulance service transport. If a patient going between the hospitals needs the level of care provided by an ambulance, they will get it. SA Health already uses private providers to transport patients, and they did so under the former Labor government. They use them in SALHN, they use them in NALHN, they use them in the country and they use them in SAS itself, so it is completely hypocritical for the Labor opposition to come in here and tell us that you need to have a fully state government-run, private patient transport system. We will continue to look at opportunities to more effectively use taxpayers' money to deliver the health services that South Australians need.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>