<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-09-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1211" />
  <endPage num="1271" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="2018090599cd7bca123d439f80000156">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Liquor Licensing Fees</name>
      <text id="2018090599cd7bca123d439f80000157">
        <heading>Liquor Licensing Fees</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-09-05">
            <name>Liquor Licensing Fees</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-09-05T15:08:40" />
        <text id="2018090599cd7bca123d439f80000158">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-05T15:08:40" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (15:08):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Is the Treasurer committed to delivering in full all of the measures contained in his budget? In particular, is the Treasurer committed to realising all of the revenue foreshadowed—some $3.2 million a year—with the introduction of revised liquor licensing fees informed by recommendations contained in the Anderson review, a measure as outlined in Budget Paper 5 on page 17?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-09-05">
            <name>Liquor Licensing Fees</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-09-05T15:09:13" />
        <text id="2018090599cd7bca123d439f80000159">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-05T15:09:13" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:09):</by>  The government is committed to the budget that has been introduced into the House of Assembly yesterday. The simple answer to the question is, the government is committed to all expenditure measures that are, by inference, included in the budget and all revenue measures that are either by inference or explicitly referred to in the budget.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>