<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-09-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1211" />
  <endPage num="1271" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>SA Pathology</name>
      <text id="20180905e6a5b440b4f34c3aa0000189">
        <heading>SA Pathology</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5413" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. E.S. BOURKE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-09-05">
            <name>SA Pathology</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-09-05T15:16:20" />
        <text id="20180905e6a5b440b4f34c3aa0000190">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-05T15:16:20" />
          <by role="member" id="5413">The Hon. E.S. BOURKE (15:16):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Do the more than 880 job cuts within SA Health include job cuts in SA Pathology and SA Medical Imaging, or will the privatisation result in further job losses?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-09-05">
            <name>SA Pathology</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-09-05T15:16:38" />
        <text id="20180905e6a5b440b4f34c3aa0000191">
          <timeStamp time="2018-09-05T15:16:38" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (15:16):</by>  In terms of the way forward in terms of SA Pathology, it will undergo an external review to identify opportunities for improvement that provide for appropriate care to be delivered in a sustainable way. PricewaterhouseCoopers has been appointed to undertake the review, commencing in September 2018. It will take approximately six months to examine in detail the public and commercial services provided by SA Pathology.</text>
        <text id="20180905e6a5b440b4f34c3aa0000192">The steering committee, chaired by the Department for Health and Wellbeing, and involving representatives from local health networks and general practice, will oversee the process, and SA Pathology will engage staff, unions and other stakeholders through the process. What that review finds in terms of ways that SA Pathology can become more efficient, we will need to wait for the completion of that review in what I understand will be about six months.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>