<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-06-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="529" />
  <endPage num="589" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Savings Targets</name>
      <page num="541" />
      <text id="2018062039a1099a72c1479c80000218">
        <heading>Savings Targets</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-20">
            <name>Savings Targets</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-20T15:04:25" />
        <text id="2018062039a1099a72c1479c80000219">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-20T15:04:25" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (15:04):</by>  Supplementary: why is the Treasurer committing to maintain efficiency dividends, he says, from the former government's Mid-Year Budget Review, yet in the previous answer he also confirmed that he is taking a hard decision to cut the programs that were funded by these efficiency dividends?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2018062039a1099a72c1479c80000220">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  It is a very loose thread to the original answer, but I am going to allow it. Treasurer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <startTime time="2018-06-20T15:04:50" />
        <text id="2018062039a1099a72c1479c80000221">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-20T15:04:50" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:04):</by>  And, sadly, Mr President, indicates the former minister's inadequate understanding of budget related matters, which is perhaps not a surprise. Mr President, it is quite clear that the former government did leave considerable savings tasks to agencies. It is quite clear that we have added to the efficiency dividend by way of the announcements we made at the election for 2018-19 in the 4 September budget. The savings tasks for departments will be a combination of labour savings or efficiency dividends and additional ones from the incoming Liberal government.</text>
        <text id="2018062039a1099a72c1479c80000222">Now, to all intents and purposes, agencies will have to just implement the total savings task, and that will mean that, if we are going to fund new initiatives, such as abolishing payroll tax for all small businesses, we will have to, in some agencies, or right across agencies, either discontinue or not continue with certain projects or programs which might have been projects or programs the Labor Party loves, Mr President.</text>
        <text id="2018062039a1099a72c1479c80000223">So they are the difficult decisions that will need to be taken, but there is nothing inconsistent with those positions, and, in fact, it is entirely consistent with the position that we promised the people prior to the election.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>