<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-06-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="529" />
  <endPage num="589" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Career Employment Services Funding</name>
      <page num="536" />
      <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000147">
        <heading>Career Employment Services Funding</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-20">
            <name>Career Employment Services Funding</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-20T14:42:25" />
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000148">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-20T14:42:25" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (14:42):</by>  Point of clarification, Mr President: the Treasurer has misunderstood the question—</text>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000149">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000150">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  Or it's a supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000151">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  So it's a supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000152">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  The question was: what criteria was used to determine that these two types of programs—Jobs First Employment Projects and Career Services programs—would be cut, and the question regarding the savings figure was in relation to those two programs.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <startTime time="2018-06-20T14:42:47" />
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000153">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-20T14:42:47" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:42):</by>  The criteria that is governing the new government is twofold. First, the overarching criteria is to grow the economy and create jobs, to reduce the cost of living and costs for South Australian families and to deliver better services. That is the overarching mantra of the government. We were elected on that particular program, and we intend to deliver it. That is the guiding influence.</text>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000154">The second influence, which will influence decisions for ministers and agencies, is to deliver the efficiency savings targets both that the former Labor government left with the agencies and any additional ones the incoming government has offered. Linked with that—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. Scriven</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000155">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. Scriven:</by>  So programs—helping people to get jobs—are not the priority.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000156">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  Well, these are the criteria that will govern decisions that have to be made. You have to meet your savings targets, some of which were left by the former Labor government and some of the new ones for the Liberal government. So that is a criterion. A second one will be: we've got to try to grow jobs, grow the economy, reduce the cost of living in South Australia and deliver better services. And thirdly, there are new priorities for the new government—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. Scriven</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000157">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. Scriven:</by>  So not jobs, not helping people into jobs.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000158">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  —and the new priorities will be to deliver and create jobs. One of the new priorities for the government is to abolish payroll tax for all small businesses in South Australia, something the former Labor government was unprepared to do. They saw it as something mean and nasty to cut payroll tax for small businesses in South Australia to create jobs.</text>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000159">The reality is that the new government has been elected on a program of creating jobs in the economy. That means, therefore, that some of the old priorities of the former Labor government will not be able to be continued. That's the simple reality. If you're going to deliver new priorities, if you want to get rid of payroll tax for all small businesses in South Australia and to help grow jobs and grow the economy in South Australia, you have to get rid of some of the savings programs that you have.</text>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000160">This is not an old-style Labor government; this is actually a reformist Liberal government that has been elected. The people of South Australia said, 'We've seen what old-style Labor has done over 16 years; we've seen the mess that they created'—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000161">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  Point of order: the question was in relation to what the new government is doing, not about what any old government has been doing. I note that the member has been on his feet for 13 minutes already.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000162">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I note your point of order. The Hon. Ms Scriven, do you have another point of order?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000163">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  There is a final supplementary, if the Treasurer has—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000164">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  No, I don't think the Treasurer is finished.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000165">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  You haven't finished, but you have spoken for so long and you have not said anything.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="537" />
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000166">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Ms Scriven, please sit down. Treasurer, please wind up your answer; it has been lengthy.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000167">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  I keep getting supplementary questions. They are the criteria that are governing the decisions that are being taken. That is, if we're going to fund new priorities, we have to stop funding some of the old priorities of the old-style Labor governments. They are tough decisions which have to be taken but we will not resile from taking tough decisions. If you're going to abolish payroll tax, if you have a new priority, then you have to stop funding some of the old-style Labor priorities. Sadly, you are not going to be able to continue with all those programs that the former Labor government might have loved but which were singularly unsuccessful.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000168">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  I have a final supplementary, Mr President.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180620483021ee63b24c7380000169">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I will listen to it. You have had a fair chance to prosecute your case.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>