<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-06-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="529" />
  <endPage num="589" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Career Employment Services Funding</name>
      <text id="20180620e7e25a2a3fe74cc5a0000142">
        <heading>Career Employment Services Funding</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-20">
            <name>Career Employment Services Funding</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-20T14:40:10" />
        <text id="20180620e7e25a2a3fe74cc5a0000143">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-20T14:40:10" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (14:40):</by>  I thank the minister for the answer. So what criteria was used to determine that these programs were going to be cut—and by 'these' I mean the Jobs First Employment Projects and Career Services programs? What criteria was used to determine they would be cut, and will the Treasurer confirm what the savings figure for the Minister for Industry and Skills' department is?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-20">
            <name>Career Employment Services Funding</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-20T14:40:30" />
        <text id="20180620e7e25a2a3fe74cc5a0000144">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-20T14:40:30" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:40):</by>  When the budget's released, I'll certainly be in a position to be able to indicate. But certainly in relation to the savings program of not only the Minister for Industry and Skills but all ministers, a very significant component of that will be clearly identified as a Labor efficiency dividend that had to be implemented post the election irrespective of whichever government was elected. All agencies, when the new government arrived, advised me, as the new Treasurer, that these were the efficiency dividends the former Treasurer and the former government had left with us that we had to implement post the election for the 2018-19 and forward estimates years.</text>
        <text id="20180620e7e25a2a3fe74cc5a0000145">It will be quite clear in terms of the documentation available that some of the savings tasks that agencies are confronting at the moment will be as a result of the new priorities of the new government, which we outlined at the time of the election, and clearly that will have an impact in terms of the funding priorities; but also some of the savings that agencies like industries and skills will have to implement are as a result of efficiency dividends, the most recent of which was implemented in the last weeks before Christmas last year in the Mid-Year Budget Review, when the former Labor government initiated widespread efficiency dividends that had to be implemented in all agencies post the election. They were clearly documented by the former government and the former Treasurer.</text>
        <text id="20180620e7e25a2a3fe74cc5a0000146">So any efficiency savings that are being implemented, at least in part, have been generated by decisions taken by the former Labor government—as a result of efficiency dividends that are required. In relation to the detail of savings programs for all agencies, including industries and skills, again I'll resist the kind invitation to outline all of that detail now. They are issues which will be released at the time of the budget.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>