<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-06-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="473" />
  <endPage num="527" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
      <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000203">
        <heading>Shop Trading Hours</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5413" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. E.S. BOURKE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-19">
            <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-19T15:14:18" />
        <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000204">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-19T15:14:18" />
          <by role="member" id="5413">The Hon. E.S. BOURKE (15:14):</by>  Supplementary question arising from the answer: can the Treasurer confirm that, by removing this point of difference—that regional communities can open currently and the metropolitan area can't—regional communities will not be impacted, and what modelling you are basing that on?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-19">
            <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-19T15:14:40" />
        <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000205">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-19T15:14:40" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:14):</by>  The modelling I use is common sense. With the greatest respect in the world, when I am living on the plains in Adelaide and I want to go shopping on a Sunday morning for some milk or some bread, I am not going to be choosing whether or not I am going to go to Mount Gambier or to the local, suburban supermarket. Common sense tells me that if I have the choice between driving to Mount Gambier to get my milk and bread or getting it from a local supermarket in suburban Adelaide, I will choose the suburban supermarket. I am not going to be mulling over in my own mind, 'Shall I drive four hours and 20 minutes to Mount Gambier to go to a supermarket or should I stay here in Adelaide?'</text>
        <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000206">I will make a common-sense judgement. I don't have to do modelling in relation to my consumer choices. It’s just common sense, and if members of the Labor Party don't have common sense then it's no wonder they are in opposition. That's the sort of logic they are putting before the house in terms of defending the indefensible, and the indefensible—their position, we know—is whatever the shoppies union says they will do and they are required to follow. For a brief period of time, the Leader of the Opposition in another place said—in a brain explosion, I suspect—'I might even think about nine to 11 on a Sunday morning.' I am sure he got a phone call from the shoppies union saying, 'Peter, what did you just say?'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="485" />
        <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000207">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Refer to the member by his proper title.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000208">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  The shoppies union wouldn't have been saying, 'Member for Croydon', they would have been saying, 'Peter, mate, what did you just say on television? Did you just say, contrary to what the shoppies union dictates require of you, that you might be prepared to look at nine to 11 on a Sunday morning?' He would have said, 'Oops, okay, I'll put it into reverse gear. That's off the table.'</text>
        <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000209">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000210">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  Yes, exactly. 'How high do you want me to jump?' he would have said to the shoppies union. 'How high do you want me to jump?' in relation to shop trading legislation. So it is quite clear who is calling the shots in the Labor Party. The shoppies union gets on the phone to the Leader of the Opposition in another place and he has got five reverse gears rather than five forward gears. Most people have five forward and one reverse, but the Leader of the Opposition has five reverse gears, from first to overdrive, and he was in overdrive within about 24 hours. He reversed as quickly as you could imagine. He had been told by the shoppies union, 'You're not even going to be contemplating that. If you do, preselection, funding', all of those particular controls that the shoppies union have in relation to the Labor Party—we have seen it for decades and we will continue to see it for decades.</text>
        <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000211">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201806195c4821e40dfa4c7d80000212">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>