<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-06-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="433" />
  <endPage num="471" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="201806077c8658c89cf84500b0000225">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-07">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-07T15:22:00" />
        <text id="201806077c8658c89cf84500b0000226">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-07T15:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (15:22):</by>  Supplementary: can the Treasurer also, on seeking advice and bringing it back to the chamber, advise what his definition of 'heritage style' is, which buildings have actual heritage values and which buildings would otherwise have his appellation of 'heritage style' and how that might differ?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-07">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-07T15:22:16" />
        <text id="201806077c8658c89cf84500b0000227">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-07T15:22:16" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:22):</by>  I am happy to do that, and I use that phrase advisedly because I freely confess to not being an expert in terms of what ought to be described as a heritage building. I am aware that there are local, state, federal and I think probably international definitions of heritage buildings. Essentially, the ones that I am referring to are the old buildings along Frome Road and on North Terrace where I am advised that the former government was told, and we have been told, that those buildings cannot be demolished.</text>
        <page num="448" />
        <text id="201806077c8658c89cf84500b0000228">I think there is one older-style building further down Frome Road where the former government and the new government have been told that that is not required to be kept, and the former government and the new government have that as part of the demolition program, but I understand that, sort of, the buildings that start from around Eleanor Harrald, Margaret Graham and around to McEwin Building and the Bice Building, I think, on North Terrace—says he, struggling to remember the names of all these buildings—there are five or six of them, and our advice or my understanding of our advice is that they are all heritage-style buildings and have to be kept. Whether that is local, state, federal, heritage, I will get the definition for the honourable member and bring back a reply.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>