<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-06-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="337" />
  <endPage num="383" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Lyell McEwin Hospital</name>
      <text id="20180605e0626e97c7964c9b80000150">
        <heading>Lyell McEwin Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-05">
            <name>Lyell McEwin Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-05T14:58:40" />
        <text id="20180605e0626e97c7964c9b80000151">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-05T14:58:40" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (14:58):</by>  Further supplementary: in relation to that answer and the original answer, how much of the budget for that capital outlay in terms of the additional build at the Lyell McEwin and how much of the ongoing outlay in salaries for the consultants, nurses and administrative staff will be part of this year's financial year report, which the Hon. Mr Lucas tells us is already in the red, and how much will be put into the forwards?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Health and Wellbeing</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-06-05">
            <name>Lyell McEwin Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-06-05T14:59:08" />
        <text id="20180605e0626e97c7964c9b80000152">
          <timeStamp time="2018-06-05T14:59:08" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (14:59):</by>  I must admit I don't understand the import of the member's question. The expenditure on this project was part of Labor's fit of embarrassment about Transforming Health when, was it the middle of June last year, the former Labor premier (Mr Weatherill) and the now Leader of the Opposition in the other place, the former minister for health, now not a member of this place, went to The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and announced the dumping of Transforming Health.</text>
        <text id="20180605e0626e97c7964c9b80000153">Soon after, the budget had a number of projects, which were an attempt to try to start the recovery of the public health system. After three years of demolition the damage had well and truly been done. I am glad that at least they put the first step towards recovery, but there are a lot more steps to go.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>