<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-05-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="263" />
  <endPage num="299" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Housing Research Program</name>
      <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000138">
        <heading>Housing Research Program</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-30">
            <name>Housing Research Program</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-30T14:49:50" />
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000139">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-30T14:49:50" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (14:49):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Human Services. Given the revelations in parliament during the last sitting week that the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) had alleged links to the Calabrian mafia, and the minister was unsure whether she had received advice about AHURI:</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000140">1.&amp;#x9;Will the minister now advise whether, on checking, the minister or the minister's staff had received a brief about AHURI, and what did it say?</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000141">2.&amp;#x9;What further advice did the minister seek on AHURI?</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000142">3.&amp;#x9;Does she intend to continue with the election commitment to engage AHURI to audit the state's current housing assets—</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000143">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000144">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! Leader of the Opposition, I cannot hear your own member ask the question. Those comments equally apply to the front bench of the government. You can start the question again, the Hon. Ms Scriven, if you feel you need to.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000145">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  The minister yesterday talked about a conference, I understand, not this question, so the minister might like the beginning of the question again:</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000146">1.&amp;#x9;Will the minister now advise whether, on checking, the minister or the minister's staff had received a brief about AHURI, and what did it say?</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000147">2.&amp;#x9;What further advice did the minister seek on AHURI?</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000148">3.&amp;#x9;Does she intend to continue with the election commitment to engage AHURI to audit the state's current housing assets and map future demand?</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000149">4.&amp;#x9;Is the commitment to engage AHURI to audit the state's housing assets distinct and separate to the commitment to initiate full conditions assessment of Housing SA properties within 30 days?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Human Services</electorate>
        <startTime time="2018-05-30T14:51:16" />
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000150">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-30T14:51:16" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (14:51):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her questions. Can I just point out for the record that her comments in her first question are entirely incorrect and should have been corrected, if she had bothered to read the <term>Hansard </term>yesterday, where quite clearly they were indicated as incorrect. AHURI has not been indicated as being linked in any way to those mafia allegations.</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000151">There were allegations made in relation to an organisation called Development Victoria which was under the investigation of the Victorian government. The Victorian government has not investigated AHURI, and AHURI's reputation should not be sullied by the Australian Labor Party in this state. It should be embarrassed. Its own spokesperson for homelessness and housing, the Hon. Doug Cameron, is a guest speaker, a keynote speaker, at two AHURI conferences. So I urge the South Australian Labor Party to cease and desist from making such comments on the parliamentary record which are clearly incorrect.</text>
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000152">I have received a lot of information about AHURI and have placed a number of items on the record yesterday. The election commitment is indeed to engage AHURI to audit the state's current housing assets and map future demand. Analysis is being undertaken by the department, the precise value of which will be determined. It is the intention of this government to engage AHURI as per our election commitment within our 100 days.</text>
        <page num="272" />
        <text id="2018053039a007718085435280000153">The final question relates to the asset assessment versus this, so they are two very separate issues. They are being undertaken by two separate organisations, as is appropriate. The asset inspection is being undertaken by RTC, and this was subject to a question which I will be bringing back further details on as per my commitment when I took some of those questions on notice. I will be bringing those back within a couple of weeks, and that is quite separate to AHURI, which is a research organisation to map the demand across South Australia. So they are very separate pieces of work and very separate functions.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>