<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-05-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="263" />
  <endPage num="299" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing</name>
      <page num="267" />
      <text id="201805307692f15f62234cb290000079">
        <heading>National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-30">
            <name>National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-30T14:31:21" />
        <text id="201805307692f15f62234cb290000080">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-30T14:31:21" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (14:31):</by>  I am seeking some clarity on this issue because we have the Minister for Human Services saying that the Treasurer was conducting treasurer-level agreements and negotiations, whereas the Treasurer just told us now that he was in fact 'involved' in discussions. Now, those things are quite distinctly different. I ask the Treasurer: are you leading these discussions at a national level on the NPARIH agreement, or is the Minister for Human Services?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-30">
            <name>National Partnership Agreement on Remote Indigenous Housing</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-30T14:31:51" />
        <text id="201805307692f15f62234cb290000081">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-30T14:31:51" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:31):</by>  As always, this new incoming Marshall Liberal government is a partnership, it is a collaboration. We have ministers who take responsibility and we have shared responsibilities in relation to these particular issues. In terms of the discussions with the federal Treasurer—</text>
        <text id="201805307692f15f62234cb290000082">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201805307692f15f62234cb290000083">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Allow the Treasurer to respond in silence.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201805307692f15f62234cb290000084">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  In terms of the discussions with the federal Treasurer and the state and territory treasurers, I have had sole carriage of those discussions. I have led the discussions. I have been involved in the discussions, whichever particular phraseology the honourable member would like to use—involved, led, participated in—whatever phrase he would like to use I would be quite comfortable with. So in those discussions with the federal Treasurer and with state and territory treasurers I have been the state minister involved in all of those discussions.</text>
        <text id="201805307692f15f62234cb290000085">In terms of discussions with housing ministers, that is not an issue in terms of the housing ministers that I have had direct negotiation or discussions with, other than of course my ministerial colleague in South Australia. The discussions in terms of national partnership agreements—and I am not sure whether the Hon. Mr Hunter was asleep at the wheel at state cabinet meetings but if there were national partnership agreements with education, for example, or with health, as we are currently having discussions at the moment, and housing, and I think there might be a fourth area, as the Treasurer, I am actively engaged, involved, participate, whatever word you would like to use, in all of those discussions. But in relation to health, for example, there is obviously a discussion that also goes on between health ministers at their particular level as well, but as the Treasurer I am also involved or participate in terms of discussions with federal Treasury because ultimately there are very significant budget impacts.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>