<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-05-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="241" />
  <endPage num="262" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Health Safe Access Zones</name>
      <text id="20180529b75e99305c9a4ff2b0000270">
        <heading>Health Safe Access Zones</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-29">
            <name>Health Safe Access Zones</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-29T15:38:10" />
        <text id="20180529b75e99305c9a4ff2b0000271">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-29T15:38:10" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (15:38):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before addressing a question to the Minister for Health and Wellbeing on the topic of health safe access zones.</text>
        <text id="20180529b75e99305c9a4ff2b0000272">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180529b75e99305c9a4ff2b0000273">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  As the health minister—and I imagine many members of this council—would be aware, there has been a trend to health safe access zones (or in the UK they are referred to as health buffer zones) to ensure that those people attending a clinic for reproductive health purposes, or to support someone attending those reproductive health services, enjoy safety, dignity and comfort in access to that health access service.</text>
        <text id="20180529b75e99305c9a4ff2b0000274">Around Australia we have seen moves to implement safe access zones in Victoria, the ACT and Tasmania. In previous weeks, a bill in New South Wales passed the upper house and is due to be debated in the lower house in the coming month. That bill provides a protection area of some 150 metres to ensure that those people and their supporters accessing those particular health services in that state will be free of what has been revealed to be harassment and, in fact, violence, in the New South Wales example, when they seek to access those services.</text>
        <text id="20180529b75e99305c9a4ff2b0000275">Here in South Australia, we have no such protection zone. I note that each year the 40 Days for Life campaign runs from Ash Wednesday to Palm Sunday, and indeed there are regular protests and visuals outside our reproductive health services in this state. The 40 Days for Life campaign boasts on their website that, since their inception in 2007, they have successfully closed 102 abortion facilities and indeed they boast that they have seen 184 abortion workers quit their jobs.</text>
        <text id="20180529b75e99305c9a4ff2b0000276">My question to the Minister for Health and Wellbeing is: what protections are afforded South Australians seeking health services and workers in those health services to ensure they have safe access to health services and a safe employment environment?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Health and Wellbeing</electorate>
        <startTime time="2018-05-29T15:40:40" />
        <text id="20180529b75e99305c9a4ff2b0000277">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-29T15:40:40" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (15:40):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. In terms of the relevant legislation, obviously the member is referring to abortion law, which in South Australia is contained within the Criminal Law Consolidation Act. There are provisions in the Criminal Law Consolidation Act which could have relevance in the context of protesters impeding in a threatening manner persons trying to access medical services, including medical termination services. Of course, that act is not committed to me, but I make that comment.</text>
        <text id="20180529b75e99305c9a4ff2b0000278">I note, as the honourable member said, Tasmania, Victoria and the ACT have laws authorising safe access zones around abortion clinics and that similar laws are before the New South Wales parliament. These laws recognise the right of people to access legally available services. However, they do raise issues in relation to freedom of speech. I notice that there are at least two legal challenges to the validity of the laws. The laws under challenge, I understand, are in Victoria and Tasmania, so I'm sure that the Attorney-General would be watching those cases, and this parliament may choose to have the validity of such laws clarified before it considers legislating.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>