<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-05-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="135" />
  <endPage num="167" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mount Gambier Renal Dialysis Unit</name>
      <page num="147" />
      <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000195">
        <heading>Mount Gambier Renal Dialysis Unit</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-15">
            <name>Mount Gambier Renal Dialysis Unit</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-15T15:11:06" />
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000196">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-15T15:11:06" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (15:11):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Health and Wellbeing.</text>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000197">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000198">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  In question time last week, the minister stated that the previous Labor government did not support the renal dialysis unit in Mount Gambier. However, on 24 January 2018, <term>The</term><term>Border Watch</term> newspaper correctly reported that the Labor government had committed to funding the unit. In fact—</text>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000199">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000200">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000201">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  In fact, the funding was in the state Labor government's Mid-Year Budget Review. Since this funding was in the former state Labor government's Mid-Year Budget Review, will the minister now admit that he has once again effectively misled the chamber?</text>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000202">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000203">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order! Let the minister answer in silence.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Health and Wellbeing</electorate>
        <startTime time="2018-05-15T15:12:02" />
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000204">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-15T15:12:02" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (15:12):</by>  My comment was in the context of the term as a whole. I acknowledge that the honourable member may well be right and it may well have been in the Mid-Year Budget Review, but the fact of the matter is that this former Labor government had form when it came to breaching commitments. Let's look at the—</text>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000205">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. Scriven interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000206">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Let the minister answer in silence.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. Ridgway</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000207">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway:</by>  You are learning bad habits from your leader.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000208">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  Okay, well let's talk about TQEH stage 3 redevelopment. It was in the budget—</text>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000209">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000210">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order! Let the minister answer in silence, please.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000211">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  Budgets come and budgets go, elections come and elections go, but a Labor Party will continue to break promises, whether it is delivering on the Repat or delivering on TQEH stage 3 redevelopment. They promised it in 2010, they promised it in 2014 going into the election, it was in the budget—it was still a broken promise.</text>
        <text id="20180515f1c9ae3397154029b0000212">The Labor Party announced their Mount Gambier renal commitment after we did—we did that in late 2017. Yet the former minister, Mr Malinauskas, actually went to Mount Gambier after the Bollywood event, which I attended, and did not make a commitment. The fact that it was in the Mid-Year Budget Review would be of no comfort to the people of Mount Gambier because Labor Party governments break promises and they break budgets.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>