<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-05-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="71" />
  <endPage num="108" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Answers to Questions</name>
      <text id="201805098adbdf3e038e4d8c80000093">
        <heading>Answers to Questions</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-09">
            <name>Answers to Questions</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-09T14:37:44" />
        <text id="201805098adbdf3e038e4d8c80000094">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-09T14:37:44" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (14:37):</by>  My question is to the Leader of the Government. In view of the fact that we passed a motion yesterday to impose a 30-day time limit to answer questions on notice, will the government consider imposing a time frame for questions asked without notice, and if not, why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-09">
            <name>Answers to Questions</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-09T14:38:03" />
        <text id="201805098adbdf3e038e4d8c80000095">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-09T14:38:03" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:38):</by>  It has been an issue that I have discussed with some of my ministerial colleagues and certainly the best endeavours from ministers will be to try to comply with the spirit and intent of the sessional order change that we have passed as a chamber. The model in the other states, by and large—I don't have the documentation with me—does relate to questions on notice. It hasn't related to questions without notice during question time but, certainly, I can indicate on behalf of my ministerial colleagues that we will endeavour to operate within the spirit and intent of the sessional order which relates to questions on notice.</text>
        <text id="201805098adbdf3e038e4d8c80000096">When it comes to the work of the Standing Orders Committee, I am happy to explore what, if any, provisions exist in other jurisdictions that relate to questions without notice during question time where some aspect of them might be taken on notice. That can certainly be a discussion that we can have during the Standing Orders Committee. So, the answer to the question is yes; we have followed and will significantly follow the precedence in other jurisdictions. On behalf of my ministerial colleagues, I give you the undertaking that, to the extent that we can, we will endeavour to comply with the spirit and intent of the sessional order in relation to questions that we take on notice during question time.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>