<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-05-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="37" />
  <endPage num="69" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Employees</name>
      <text id="201805082d1b3bbe9d4942d6a0000068">
        <heading>Public Sector Employees</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-08">
            <name>Public Sector Employees</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-08T14:32:05" />
        <text id="201805082d1b3bbe9d4942d6a0000069">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-08T14:32:05" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:32):</by>  I have a further supplementary arising from the original question. Just for the sake of clarification, I think an answer was given that tended towards it, but arising from the original question: can the minister confirm he has not been involved in any discussions regarding the termination of any chief executives?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-08">
            <name>Public Sector Employees</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-08T14:32:25" />
        <text id="201805082d1b3bbe9d4942d6a0000070">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-08T14:32:25" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:32):</by>  I am not going to go into discussions that I have with cabinet colleagues and, indeed, with the Premier. That was the position of the Leader of the Opposition when he was a member of the cabinet. Discussions that are covered by cabinet confidentiality will not be outlined by me in relation to any discussions that might have occurred.</text>
        <text id="201805082d1b3bbe9d4942d6a0000071">The bottom line is there is nothing that prevents a minister or indeed anyone who wants to put a point of view or have a discussion in relation to a particular chief executive officer's appointment. The Public Sector Management Act does not render that unlawful. What is rendered unlawful is if a minister, for example, was to terminate the position or seek to terminate a position of either a chief executive officer or indeed any officer at a level below a chief executive officer.</text>
        <text id="201805082d1b3bbe9d4942d6a0000072">I don't intend to outline discussions I may or may not have had with the Premier. They are confidential discussions that I would have had with the Premier both, I would imagine, before the state election when neither of us had the authority to take any action or indeed subsequent to the election when certainly the Premier is the only person who would have had the authority to take action should he have so chosen.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>