<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-05-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="37" />
  <endPage num="69" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Freedom of Information Laws</name>
      <text id="201805087cf42659d09b42f380000317">
        <heading>Freedom of Information Laws</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-08">
            <name>Freedom of Information Laws</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-08T15:27:26" />
        <text id="201805087cf42659d09b42f380000318">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-08T15:27:26" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (15:27):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Hon. Rob Lucas, Treasurer, representing the Attorney-General, the Hon. Vickie Chapman, about freedom of information laws in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="201805087cf42659d09b42f380000319">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201805087cf42659d09b42f380000320">
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO:</by>  Recently, the South Australian Ombudsman, Mr Wayne Lines, was highly critical of the state's current FOI laws, saying that ministers and heads of government departments should face penalties for delaying and obstructing the flow of documents. An expert in FOI, Professor Rick Snell from the University of Tasmania, described them as 'worse than the rules of a Third World country'. Last year, there were 10,555 FOI applications. In 1991-92, when the law was introduced, there were just 1,208, so there is now a huge demand for transparency and information.</text>
        <text id="201805087cf42659d09b42f380000321">Therefore, my question to the Attorney-General through the Treasurer is: in light of the criticism levelled, will his government now conduct a total overhaul of the act, as they indicated when in opposition, and include recommendations made by Mr Lines; and does the government intend to release documents if they are requested by the State Ombudsman, the Coroner and the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption, Judge Lander, including those cabinet documents relating to the Oakden scandal?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <startTime time="2018-05-08T15:29:00" />
        <text id="201805087cf42659d09b42f380000322">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-08T15:29:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:29):</by>  I am happy to take the honourable member's questions on notice, refer them to the Attorney-General and bring back a reply. I think, in relation to the last question, the Attorney-General, on behalf of the government, has already made some public comment. That is the provision of documents requested by the ICAC commissioner in certain circumstances, and I am happy to have included in the reply what the government has already put on the public record. In concluding my response, having been an avid user of freedom of information for many, many years, I am looking forward to answering many of the FOI requests I have made, which remain unanswered, on the passage of the 16 years.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>