<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2018-05-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="36" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Building Better Schools Program</name>
      <text id="201805031b46ce7ff5b746ebb0000621">
        <heading>Building Better Schools Program</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4867" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.T. NGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-03">
            <name>Building Better Schools Program</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-03T17:11:24" />
        <text id="201805031b46ce7ff5b746ebb0000622">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-03T17:11:24" />
          <by role="member" id="4867">The Hon. T.T. NGO (17:11):</by>  I have a question for the new Treasurer. Will the Treasurer rule out withdrawing or reallocating any of the $690 million worth of funding allocated to 91 state public schools as part of the Building Better Schools program by the previous government?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2018-05-03">
            <name>Building Better Schools Program</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2018-05-03T17:11:47" />
        <text id="201805031b46ce7ff5b746ebb0000623">
          <timeStamp time="2018-05-03T17:11:47" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (17:11):</by>  If I have interpreted the honourable member's question correctly, it is the former government's commitment to $692 million in capital expenditure on a number of schools. The Liberal Party, in the period leading up to the election, made a commitment that we would continue with that particular program. We have reiterated that commitment subsequently. The only caveat we have put on it is that we believe that the money we are talking about—the $692 million—should in part be used to prepare secondary schools for the movement of year 7s into those particular secondary schools. So, if we have $692 million to spend on capital works and if there is money to be spent on a high school, it would seem to make sense to actually provision for the increased numbers of year 7 students going into that particular high school. We indicated that prior to the election and we have reiterated that particular position since the election.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>