<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-11-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8553" />
  <endPage num="8640" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Daw Park Site</name>
      <text id="201711289443c4e285cb42e990000453">
        <heading>Daw Park Site</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-11-28">
            <name>Daw Park Site</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-11-28T14:39:56" />
        <text id="201711289443c4e285cb42e990000454">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-28T14:39:56" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:39):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before directing a question to the Minister for Health on the subject of the Daw Park site, the former Repatriation General Hospital.</text>
        <text id="201711289443c4e285cb42e990000455">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201711289443c4e285cb42e990000456">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  The ACH Group has made a submission to the government to amend the zoning of the former Repat site to make land subdivision a permitted use. The group has indicated that it expects to pay stamp duty on the sale in spite of the fact that it is a charity. My question for the minister is: can the minister assure this place that he will not agree to any master plan for the former Repat site which is predicated or includes a sell-off of Repat land?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-11-28T14:40:38" />
        <text id="201711289443c4e285cb42e990000457">
          <timeStamp time="2017-11-28T14:40:38" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse) (14:40):</by>  The government's position in respect to the Repat site is clear. We've got an agreement with the ACH Group which is all about making sure that that site is used into the future in the community's interest, and that is what we are working towards delivering. I am expecting in due course, in fact hopefully rather soon, from the ACH the master plan for that site. We are very confident and hopeful that that master plan will be consistent with the principles that we have set out for the site, including it being used for community use in a health-precinct orientated way.</text>
        <text id="201711289443c4e285cb42e990000458">It's a great site. It's an iconic site. It's got a lot of emotion attached to it, and that's something that we are very keen to acknowledge. But we want to make sure that the site can be used in a way that is consistent with the needs of the community and consistent with the legitimate expectations the community has around it. We want to make sure that the site honours the legacy of it but also delivers an outstanding service into the future.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>