<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-11-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8303" />
  <endPage num="8377" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Statutes Amendment (Child Exploitation and Encrypted Material) Bill</name>
      <bills>
        <bill id="s4235">
          <name>Statutes Amendment (Child Exploitation and Encrypted Material) Bill</name>
        </bill>
      </bills>
      <text id="20171114e8444ee2080943eca0000125">
        <heading>Statutes Amendment (Child Exploitation and Encrypted Material) Bill</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20171114e8444ee2080943eca0000126">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20171114e8444ee2080943eca0000127">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="20171114e8444ee2080943eca0000128">(Continued from 18 October 2017.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="4364" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. K.L. VINCENT</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <startTime time="2017-11-14T12:37:48" />
          <text id="20171114e8444ee2080943eca0000129">
            <timeStamp time="2017-11-14T12:37:48" />
            <by role="member" id="4364">The Hon. K.L. VINCENT (12:37):</by>  I speak today on behalf of the Dignity Party in support of this bill, which essentially gives police officers more powers to demand passwords and gain access to technological devices that they reasonably suspect contain material pertaining to child exploitation.</text>
          <text id="20171114e8444ee2080943eca0000130">I know that some might take a civil liberty approach to this particular measure and have concerns about expanding police powers to demand access to people's personal devices, but in this particular instance, given that the police do have to have a reasonable suspicion that the device does contain exploitative material and that these measures pertain to children, I think it is reasonable to take whatever measures we can to make sure that that material is accessed and that those who access that material, possess that material and produce that material are suitably punished.</text>
          <text id="20171114e8444ee2080943eca0000131">I do want to put one question to the minister responsible for this bill. Given that police officers are going to be given access to more devices that they reasonably suspect contain child exploitation material, and given that that is likely to increase their workload and the frequency with which they are looking at child pornography and, to say the least, other very unpleasant material, what plan is there to increase supports for police officers in terms of both the workload and the mental health toll that that could take?</text>
          <text id="20171114e8444ee2080943eca0000132">I understand that they are already required to take some breaks from looking at such material in undertaking this workload, but I would like to know whether there are any specific measures in place to support the mental health of these officers accessing that material, particularly where they are required to gain access to a child pornography network by essentially posing as a child pornographer. I think it is reasonable to ask what supports are in place to support the mental health of police officers accessing that material as part of their work. Other than that question, I support the bill.</text>
          <text id="20171114e8444ee2080943eca0000133">Debate adjourned on motion of Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>