<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-10-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7875" />
  <endPage num="7981" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Elective Surgery</name>
      <text id="20171018f7a7cde01a544523a0000242">
        <heading>Elective Surgery</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-10-18">
            <name>Elective Surgery</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-10-18T14:42:18" />
        <text id="20171018f7a7cde01a544523a0000243">
          <timeStamp time="2017-10-18T14:42:18" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:42):</by>  Supplementary question: given the minister thinks that the spike in elective surgery was a result of the winter flu season, why did it triple in a month, and that month was the month that coincided with the move of the Royal Adelaide Hospital?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-10-18">
            <name>Elective Surgery</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-10-18T14:42:33" />
        <text id="20171018f7a7cde01a544523a0000244">
          <timeStamp time="2017-10-18T14:42:33" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse) (14:42):</by>  If I understand the honourable member's supplementary question correctly, he is suggesting that the government's decision to move to the new Royal Adelaide Hospital resulted in more people getting flu. Is that the implication of the honourable member's question? So, does that also mean that the move to the Royal Adelaide Hospital that occurred here in metropolitan Adelaide also somehow had some far-reaching health consequence where the record spike in the number of flu cases that we saw occur in Victoria and New South Wales was also a consequence of the Royal Adelaide move?</text>
        <text id="20171018f7a7cde01a544523a0000245">I mean, Mr President, the Liberal Party's opposition to the new Royal Adelaide Hospital has just now jumped the shark. We have got the Liberal Party arguing that the new Royal Adelaide Hospital is causing people in the Eastern States to have more flu. How patently absurd. It is about time that the opposition realise that the new Royal Adelaide Hospital is going to deliver an outstanding service to this community, and their idea to somehow blame everything that occurs on the Royal Adelaide Hospital, including more flu in the Eastern States, represents the complete lunacy of the Liberal Party's position on health generally.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>