<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-10-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7815" />
  <endPage num="7873" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Outpatient Medical Imaging</name>
      <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000168">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Hospital Outpatient Medical Imaging</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-10-17">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Outpatient Medical Imaging</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-10-17T14:58:35" />
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000169">
          <timeStamp time="2017-10-17T14:58:35" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:58):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the question.</text>
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000170">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="7823" />
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000171">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  I note that the contract for the new Royal Adelaide Hospital was signed in 2011. Staff were told after the contract was signed that more outpatient imaging services would be brought in-house into the new Royal Adelaide Hospital. Obviously, since 2011, the devolved configuration of medical imaging around the new Royal Adelaide Hospital was clear, yet the government put the proposal to the market this year merely months before the new hospital opened. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000172">1.&amp;#x9;Why did the government fail to plan for the clear increase in the need for medical imaging personnel, technicians and staff in the context of the devolved nature of the new RAH and the need to bring the services in-house?</text>
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000173">2.&amp;#x9;Why didn't the government engage clinicians in putting forward an alternative model until the second half of this year?</text>
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000174">3.&amp;#x9;What is the net additional cost of the new arrangement?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-10-17T14:59:54" />
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000175">
          <timeStamp time="2017-10-17T14:59:54" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse) (14:59):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. I do not accept much of the premise of his question, in that the government did plan for the additional outpatient medical imaging services, as was comprehensively outlined in my ministerial statement. I refer the honourable member to my ministerial statement, which goes into a bit of detail around exactly the process the government has followed and the conclusion that we have arrived at.</text>
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000176">Needless to say, the government is very satisfied with the outcome that we have achieved through this process, where we called for private operators to, essentially, compete against the in-house model. The numbers, in terms of finances, I am advised, are subject to a commercial-in-confidence arrangement. What I can say with a great degree of authority is that I am advised that it is a very good outcome for South Australian taxpayers, notwithstanding the fact that our priority is about getting better outcomes for patients and that's what will be provided for in this new facility.</text>
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000177">The honourable member was right to refer to the fact that we signed the contract to build the brand-new Royal Adelaide Hospital a number of years ago. All of us on this side of the house, who fought hard in one way or another to realise the new Royal Adelaide Hospital coming to fruition, are very proud of it. It takes time to build a $2 billion state-of-the-art world-class facility. All of us were committed to it. We weren't running away, complaining about it. We didn't buckle at the knees at the first sign of political pressure or opposition from those opposite. We weren't running around in cahoots with other newly formed political parties that had one singular objective, which was to stop the new Royal Adelaide Hospital. We pressed on, and we have delivered it—a brand-new world-class facility.</text>
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000178">The honourable member is right to point out the fact that within that new world-class facility is an extended capacity when it comes to medical imaging services. We are really proud of it. It is a great outcome, and we know that for decades to come South Australians are going to be incredibly grateful for the fact that they are in this new facility rather than stuck in a 200-year-old facility that those opposite would have patients stuck in. Those people would have us stuck in it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000179">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire:</by>  Two hundred years old—what a load of nonsense. Two hundred years old—you've got to be joking!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2017101795db14dc5d3e41ed90000180">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order, the Hon. Mr Brokenshire! The Hon. Mr Wade has the floor.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>