<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-09-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7705" />
  <endPage num="7813" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000245">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-09-28">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-09-28T15:08:55" />
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000246">
          <timeStamp time="2017-09-28T15:08:55" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (15:08):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the minister who represents the Minister for Urban Development a question relating to the development of the old Royal Adelaide Hospital site.</text>
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000247">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000248">
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD:</by>  Last week, it was announced that the $1 billion luxury apartment redevelopment proposal for the old Royal Adelaide site has fallen through and that it would not proceed as the public had expected. Consortium spokesman Trevor Cooke said the partners were 'deeply disappointed with what can only be characterised as a change of mind by the government'. He rejected the government's suggestions that the offer was not value for money, referencing the amount paid, timing of the payments and security offered, which he alleged had 'set new records for pricing in South Australia and is backed by strong guarantees'.</text>
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000249">I have no knowledge of whether that is correct or not; hence my question. Since the announcement of the failed redevelopment plan the government has suggested there are several other possible development options that they are considering, and no doubt the public of South Australia looks forward to those being revealed. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000250">1.&amp;#x9;What are the alternative plans for the redevelopment, and when will they be disclosed to the public, other than what we have already seen?</text>
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000251">2.&amp;#x9;How much has the government spent on this redevelopment thus far, which will not proceed?</text>
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000252">3.&amp;#x9;How much has the government spent on investigating these alternative plans?</text>
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000253">4.&amp;#x9;What process is the government undertaking to ensure the site is developed as quickly as possible?</text>
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000254">5. &amp;#x9;What settlement payout provisions, if any, did the government put in the contract that may now be relevant in light of the proposed falling through of this proposed development, and what will the cost be to taxpayers, if any?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-09-28T15:10:33" />
        <text id="20170928f03049b5251f409fa0000255">
          <timeStamp time="2017-09-28T15:10:33" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (15:10):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question, and I will take that question and bring back answers from the minister responsible in another place.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>