<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-09-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7591" />
  <endPage num="7635" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Modbury Hospital</name>
      <text id="20170926447e001a943b450e90000222">
        <heading>Modbury Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-09-26">
            <name>Modbury Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-09-26T14:56:00" />
        <text id="20170926447e001a943b450e90000223">
          <timeStamp time="2017-09-26T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:56):</by>  Supplementary arising from the minister's comments in relation to the fact that the review was focused on safety: given that he has mentioned that safety is at the core of the review, does he have concerns that under the changes that have taken place at Modbury safety has become an issue?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-09-26">
            <name>Modbury Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-09-26T14:56:20" />
        <text id="20170926447e001a943b450e90000224">
          <timeStamp time="2017-09-26T14:56:20" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse) (14:56):</by>  No, not at all; in fact, quite the opposite. What I am concerned about is that a hastily produced policy that lacks detail, lacks thought and lacks consultation, could end up being a policy that compromises safety. That's my concern. I don't want to exploit my first question time as Minister for Health by entering a tit for tat political debate on Modbury and who has policies out there that lack detail.</text>
        <text id="20170926447e001a943b450e90000225">What we are going to do and my remarks simply refer to the fact that if any changes are going to be made to what services are provided at Modbury, if changes are going to be made to the way NALHN operates in and around what happens at Modbury, then I want to stipulate that one of the key criteria for those changes will be safety, will be patients' health outcomes. That will be a key criterion that everyone expects should be a key criterion when it comes to the development of policies in and around Modbury Hospital or in the health context generally.</text>
        <page num="7601" />
        <text id="20170926447e001a943b450e90000226">I am concerned that if as we approach the election one side of politics hastily puts together a press release and a policy just because there has been a reshuffle, that might be at the expense of considered thought and it might be at the expense of patient safety. It might not be, too. That is why we want to do the work and make sure that we get the advice of clinicians, get the advice of nurses, get the advice of Adelaide health professionals, get the advice of community members, to make sure that any changes that we implement at Modbury are quality ones that contribute to the continuous improvement that we are committed towards when it comes to public health in the north-eastern suburbs.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>