<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-06-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6993" />
  <endPage num="7047" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Parliamentary Procedure</name>
      <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000293">
        <heading>Parliamentary Procedure</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-06-20">
            <name>Parliamentary Procedure</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-06-20T15:26:45" />
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000294">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-20T15:26:45" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (15:26):</by>  Thank you, Mr President. I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking questions of the Leader of Government Business.</text>
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000295">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000296">
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY:</by>  Every sitting day, my office, along with all the other crossbench offices, send a whipping list to the government and opposition whips indicating whether we are ready to progress matters on the <term>Notice Paper</term>. Each parliamentary sitting day, the Greens, Dignity Party, Australian Conservatives and my office list the matters on the <term>Notice Paper</term> and specify whether we are ready for the matter to progress. The reason for requesting matters to not progress is usually because our offices are still consulting with stakeholders, considering amendments or awaiting further information from ministerial offices; it is not simply to hold up the parliament or because of disorganisation from offices.</text>
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000297">These intentions are usually respected as a matter of convention, with the understanding that if a matter is progressed when a member is not ready then that particular member will not support the bill. Other than prohibiting a member from being able to contribute to the debate, progressing a matter when a member is not ready is usually not a problem where there is overwhelming support or opposition to a matter. However, the same action can cause enormous problems when the success of a bill hinges on the vote of one or two members. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000298">1.&amp;#x9;Can the minister advise what is the point of all the crossbenchers providing whipping advice when this advice is ignored and decisions are made to progress matters contrary to whipping advice?</text>
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000299">2.&amp;#x9;How does the minister determine what matters are to be progressed? Does consultation with the relevant minister's office take place?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-06-20T15:28:16" />
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000300">
          <timeStamp time="2017-06-20T15:28:16" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (15:28):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question and I am happy if he wants to talk to me afterwards about a particular bill that he has been prevented from contributing to or is being prevented from contributing to through the passage of the bill. I am happy for him to come to tell me about that particular bill that he cannot contribute on as a result of something that has happened in this chamber.</text>
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000301">I am not aware of one but if the honourable member wants to come to me afterwards and talk about a bill that he has been prevented from contributing to or a bill that he is now being prevented from contributing to, I am very happy for him to come and talk to me about the bill that he was not afforded an opportunity and no longer has an opportunity to contribute to. I am not aware of one.</text>
        <page num="7010" />
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000302">I think, as a general principle, we are extraordinarily respectful in this place—both the opposition and the government—to the wishes of each other and to the crossbenchers when progressing matters. However, I am happy if the honourable member wants to talk to me afterwards, if there is a bill that he has not been afforded the opportunity to contribute to and does not have an opportunity to contribute to, because I am certainly not aware of one.</text>
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000303">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20170620ec5fd50b9ce04db690000304">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>