<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-05-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6695" />
  <endPage num="6743" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Medical Cannabis</name>
      <text id="2017051701ad2f3ec4c64985a0000089">
        <heading>Medical Cannabis</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-17">
            <name>Medical Cannabis</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-17T14:39:03" />
        <text id="2017051701ad2f3ec4c64985a0000090">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-17T14:39:03" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (14:39):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Police. Does the minister agree with SAPOL's decision to proceed with the prosecution of Jenny Hallam, who was supplying medicinal cannabis oil free of charge to people who are terminally ill or suffer from an illness which responds positively to cannabis oil? Is the minister aware that there have been people who have died as a result of not receiving their cannabis oil from Jenny Hallam?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-17">
            <name>Medical Cannabis</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-17T14:39:30" />
        <text id="2017051701ad2f3ec4c64985a0000091">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-17T14:39:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:39):</by>  The answer to that question is pretty simple in that of course I support our men and women in uniform fulfilling their obligations as police officers and enforcing the law as it stands. Our men and women in uniform do not have the liberty of choosing which laws they enforce and which ones they do not. They have made an oath to uphold the law of the state and to enforce the law of the state.</text>
        <text id="2017051701ad2f3ec4c64985a0000092">While I appreciate the circumstances around the charging of the lady mentioned by the honourable member are somewhat controversial, our police have to be independent of the political view of the day around a particular piece of statute or law, and enforce it. While it may be difficult, I think it is a concept that we all support in this place. We have a process in this state, indeed in this country, of formulating legislation. If there are flaws within respective legislation, it is up to the parliament to address those in due course. It is not within the purview of police to pick and choose what laws they enforce.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>