<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-05-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6659" />
  <endPage num="6694" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Animal Welfare</name>
      <text id="2017051623588f7a2a4a470ea0000206">
        <heading>Animal Welfare</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-16">
            <name>Animal Welfare</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-16T15:08:45" />
        <text id="2017051623588f7a2a4a470ea0000207">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-16T15:08:45" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (15:08):</by>  Supplementary: does the minister share the disappointment of consumers and constituents, and indeed the Greens, that the promised ban on animals being tested on for cosmetics in this country is not actually going to be delivered until 2019, as revealed in the budget papers, as opposed to being delivered on this year, as was promised at the federal election?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-16">
            <name>Animal Welfare</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-16T15:09:10" />
        <text id="2017051623588f7a2a4a470ea0000208">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-16T15:09:10" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change) (15:09):</by>  The Greens are attempting to lead me down a path of condemning the federal government, one that I am happy to jump onto. I thank the honourable member for it. We do have some difficulties with a federal government which calls together environment ministers. They have actually downgraded environment ministers' meetings. They are no longer even ministerial councils answerable at COAG.</text>
        <text id="2017051623588f7a2a4a470ea0000209">Instead, environment ministers have to get together and have a coffee catch-up to try to influence the federal environment minister's agenda. States come to the federal environment minister with great ideas about working together. For example, banning plastic microbeads in cosmetics. Both New South Wales and South Australia have raised this with the federal government and their response has been, 'Well, they are all great ideas, but we have no interest in providing national leadership. We will let you get on with it yourselves.' That's what the states have to do.</text>
        <text id="2017051623588f7a2a4a470ea0000210">Unfortunately, in the absence of federal government leadership, these things take a lot more time to organise. But, with assiduous action by members of the public and by state and territory jurisdictions, we can occasionally prod the government to be a little bit embarrassed about their lack of inactivity. They make these pronouncements about things coming down the track. As the Hon. Tammy Franks has noted, they make the promise at a federal election and then squib on it and say, 'You will see it come in two years' time.' Well, let's see in 2019 whether in fact it does come through. If it does it will only be because of one reason and that's because there has been a federal election and Labor will be in federal government.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>