<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-05-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6585" />
  <endPage num="6618" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000014">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Australian Labor Party Advertising</name>
      <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000015">
        <heading>Australian Labor Party Advertising</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-10">
            <name>Australian Labor Party Advertising</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-10T14:22:14" />
        <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000016">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-10T14:22:14" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:22):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Leader of the Government in the upper house a question about ALP advertising.</text>
        <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000017">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000018">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  Recently, the ALP aired an ad fronted by their federal Labor Leader, Bill Shorten. Senior Labor member, Anthony Albanese, claimed the ad should never have been produced or shown, describing it as 'a shocker of an ad'. His condemnation went further, saying, 'It's not the sort of ad that I want my party to be promoting.' Labor shadow treasurer, Chris Bowen, also labelled the ad appalling. Mr Shorten even went on to say that he would speak to the ALP about the ad. My question to the minister is: does the minister share Mr Albanese's and Mr Bowen's criticisms of the ad?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-05-10T14:22:58" />
        <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000019">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-10T14:22:58" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (14:22):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. I haven't seen the ad.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000020">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I do not think a political ad run by a party really has anything to do with the ministerial responsibilities of the minister, so I question whether that question is legitimate.</text>
        <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000021">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="6586" />
        <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000022">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I am just putting to you that, before you have too many supps, the purpose of question time is to scrutinise accountability for the ministerial responsibilities of a minister. To bring up an ad, which is a federal ad, has nothing to do with ministerial responsibilities.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000023">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  Does that mean the government here can't really bring up things about the federal Liberal government because it has no responsibility? You can't have it both ways, Mr President.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2017051056b85fa8fce2497380000024">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I have actually spoken in the past about their contribution. I am not ruling your question out of order. I am just putting a position. He has already answered a question. Depending on how many supplementary questions you are going to ask, just bear in mind that it does not have anything to do with his ministerial responsibilities.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>