<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-05-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6585" />
  <endPage num="6618" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Workers Compensation</name>
      <text id="2017051043f48a586d0b4c17a0000109">
        <heading>Police Workers Compensation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-10">
            <name>Police Workers Compensation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-05-10T14:45:56" />
        <text id="2017051043f48a586d0b4c17a0000110">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-10T14:45:56" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (14:45):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation prior to directing a question to the Minister for Police on the subject of workers compensation.</text>
        <text id="2017051043f48a586d0b4c17a0000111">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2017051043f48a586d0b4c17a0000112">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  In response to a question from my colleague the Hon. Mr Dawkins in December of last year the Minister for Police said in this house, and I quote:</text>
        <page num="6592" />
        <text id="2017051043f48a586d0b4c17a0000113">
          <inserted>SAPOL provide a range of services that go beyond the ordinary entitlements that an employee would have in terms of return to work. For instance, SAPOL does have an employee assistance section, whose job it is to provide services to those employees who have had to deal with traumatic circumstances; for instance, those employees who have attended roadside crashes—something that has certainly been topical during the course of this week and today—or those SAPOL officers who had to endure and perform incredibly difficult tasks during the course of the event that unfolded throughout metropolitan Adelaide and concluded in Hindley Street early last week.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2017051043f48a586d0b4c17a0000114">
          <inserted>Those are examples of circumstances that police officers may have to face which would result in them potentially gaining access to the employee assistance section that exists within SAPOL to provide mental health services and other services to those employees who may be struggling. None of that is changing.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2017051043f48a586d0b4c17a0000115">My question to the minister is: does he stand by that statement, and I quote, 'None of that is changing.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-05-10T14:47:11" />
        <text id="2017051043f48a586d0b4c17a0000116">
          <timeStamp time="2017-05-10T14:47:11" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:47):</by>  Changing on the back of what? I have not received any briefing from SAPOL regarding changes to the employee assistance section, which does important work, that arise out of changes to workers compensation service provision—potential changes to external case managers. We are in active conversations with the Police Association of South Australia and indeed with SAPOL leadership, specifically the police commissioner, about things we can continue to improve upon regarding provision of services around potential psychological injuries or mental health issues for police officers. But I have not received any advice from SAPOL regarding a change to the employees assistance section that would arise from changes to workers compensation arrangements.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>