<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-05-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6551" />
  <endPage num="6584" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000420">
      <heading>Answers to Questions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Adelaide Parklands</name>
      <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000421">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Adelaide Parklands</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-09">
            <name>Adelaide Parklands</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000422">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="3130">the Hon. M.C. PARNELL </by>(4 August 2016).  </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-05-09">
            <name>Adelaide Parklands</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000423">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety):</by>  The Minister for the City of Adelaide has been provided the following advice:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000424">
          <inserted>Section 23(1) of the Adelaide Park Lands Act 2005 (the Act) provides:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000425">
          <inserted>23—Steps regarding change in intended use of land</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000426">
          <inserted>(1)&amp;#x9;If land within the Adelaide Park Lands occupied by the Crown or a state authority is no longer required for any of its existing uses, the minister must ensure that a report concerning the state government's position on the future use and status of the land is prepared within the prescribed period.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000427">
          <inserted>Regulation 8 of the Adelaide Park Lands Regulations 2006 prescribes a period of 18 months for the purposes of section 23(1) above.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000428">
          <inserted>As the minister to whom the Act is now committed, I am only required to prepare a report on land in the Adelaide Park Lands occupied by the Crown or a state authority when it is no longer required for any of its existing uses, from which time I have 18 months to prepare the report.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000429">
          <inserted>In relation to the various sites referred to by the Hon Mark Parnell, I advise:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000430">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>The Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) will seek assistance and advice from Renewal SA on the preparation of section 23 reports on the redevelopment of the Casino and the Festival Plaza at the appropriate time.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000431">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>A section 23 report for the proposed new CBD high school in the Reid Building on Frome Street is not required as its existing use as an educational establishment will continue.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="201705097c02e56ee9b446c990000432">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>In relation to the O-Bahn project through the Park Lands, the land was recently transferred from the Adelaide City Council to the government for the purposes of the construction of the tunnel and busway. Once constructed the remainder of the land not required for the busway corridor (which is most of the site) will be transferred back to the care and control of the council for use as park land. It is considered that this transfer may then trigger the requirement for a report under section 23.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>