<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-03-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6267" />
  <endPage num="6300" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Water Industry Act, Reporting Obligations</name>
      <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000298">
        <heading>Water Industry Act, Reporting Obligations</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-03-28">
            <name>Water Industry Act, Reporting Obligations</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-03-28T15:21:46" />
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000299">
          <timeStamp time="2017-03-28T15:21:46" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (15:21):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Water and the River Murray about reporting obligations under the Water Industry Act.</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000300">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000301">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL:</by>  I received some correspondence last week from the Eyre Peninsula Water Action Group and I note the correspondence went to a number of members of parliament. In this letter, signed by the secretary of the group, John Hunwick, there is a claim that the minister has failed to comply with reporting obligations under the act. In particular, the claim is that there are annual reviews for the years 2014-15 and 2015-16 that have not been tabled in parliament, and also a five-yearly Eyre Peninsula demand and supply statement which they claim is also late. According to the Eyre Peninsula Water Action Group the excuse that was given by the Eyre Peninsula Natural Resources Management Board, I presume, was:</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000302">
          <inserted>The assessment of the 2014-15 water year was undertaken in-house only, and the 2015 annual review document was not prepared.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000303">Given the fundamental importance of groundwater to all who live on the Eyre Peninsula, my questions of the minister are:</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000304">1.&amp;#x9;Is the minister in breach of the Water Industry Act 2012?</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000305">2. &amp;#x9;Regardless of statutory reporting requirements, when will these reports be tabled in parliament?</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000306">3.&amp;#x9;If they are not to be tabled, why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-03-28T15:23:38" />
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000307">
          <timeStamp time="2017-03-28T15:23:38" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change) (15:23):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his most important questions. I too am a frequent correspondee of Mr Hunwick and I am, in fact, quite used to answering his questions.</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000308">The questions posed by the honourable member, which have been, I suppose, translated from correspondence, are not accurately reported, in my view, and certainly not the honourable member's terminology in terms of an excuse from the NRM board. In fact, it is not an excuse, it is actually an explanation of what has happened. The South Australian government has, of course, as we would be expected to, invested significantly in the management and planning of water resources, particularly in the Eyre Peninsula region. Our investment enables us to monitor and report on the potential for water shortages and then management responses according to that projection.</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000309">A key measure is the Eyre Peninsula demand and supply statement, which annually reviews water security on the Eyre Peninsula and estimates when water demand may exceed supply. The fourth review of the demand and supply statement was completed, I am advised, in November 2015, and it demonstrated that water supply on the Eyre Peninsula is secure until 2025-26.</text>
        <page num="6284" />
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000310">Underpinning the demand and supply statements for Eyre Peninsula are groundwater status reports, which report annually on the condition of the Musgrave and Southern Basin's prescribed groundwater resources. These reports are prepared using data collected from an extensive groundwater monitoring network, and ensure the demand and supply statements are based on the latest and best available science.</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000311">I am advised that, under the Water Industry Act 2012, we are required to manage situations where water demand is expected to exceed available supply. Where this occurs, a planning process is then established five years before supply is estimated to be exceeded, so we have plenty of time to put in place whatever measures we need to prepare for that. Based on the most recent demand and supply statement, I am advised there is no need to commence planning for an alternative supply on the Eyre Peninsula until at least 2020 and, additionally, that could be pushed out on further annual reviews.</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000312">In accordance with Water for Good, South Australia's water security plan, the government is currently comprehensively reviewing the Eyre Peninsula demand and supply statement. In addition to the demand and supply statement, the groundwater resources in both the Southern Basins and Musgrave Prescribed Wells Area are managed by a recently developed water allocation plan.</text>
        <text id="201703287be1b4a45d7548c6b0000313">The Eyre Peninsula Natural Resources Management Board endorsed the plan, which I considered and adopted back in June 2016. In developing the plan, the Eyre Peninsula NRM Board invested in considerable new science to better understand the operation of the groundwater resources into the prescribed wells area, and the NRM board has also sought the community's input prior to settling on the endorsed version of the plan. My understanding is that these plans are regularly updated to the NRM's website. I will check that that has been done in these instances, but I would be surprised if it has not.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>