<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-02-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6003" />
  <endPage num="6067" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nu-Rock Technology</name>
      <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000432">
        <heading>Nu-Rock Technology</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-02-15">
            <name>Nu-Rock Technology</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-02-15T15:12:28" />
        <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000433">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-15T15:12:28" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (15:12):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation questions regarding Nu-Rock Technology.</text>
        <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000434">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000435">
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY:</by>  Nu-Rock Technology is a company which is able to use waste ash to produce environmentally friendly building materials. The materials have been tested by the CSIRO and perform at a higher level than conventional building materials. Further to this, the Nu-Rock products are cheaper than existing building materials and are currently being used internationally. On 6 January, when asked about the government providing assistance to Nu-Rock to use the ash from Port Augusta's decommissioned power plant, the minister said:</text>
        <page num="6031" />
        <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000436">
          <inserted>We haven't received a proposal yet from Nu-Rock that is a business case that we can make that judgement on, but certainly if they do we will have a look at that.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000437">I have received documents which show that Nu-Rock put in an unsolicited bid to the South Australian government on 25 September 2015. The documents indicate that Nu-Rock had contacted the minister's chief of staff, Mr Andrew Love, about the proposal directly. Nu-Rock has the potential to create between 96 and 120 new manufacturing jobs, as well as an additional 450 support jobs. Assisting Nu-Rock could also have the potential to resolve the issue of the ash cloud, which is a matter of utmost concern for the residents of Port Augusta. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000438">1.&amp;#x9;Why did the minister say in the media on 6 January this year that the government had not received a proposal from Nu-Rock when they had spoken to his chief of staff in 2015 and submitted an unsolicited proposal to the government in September 2015?</text>
        <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000439">2.&amp;#x9;What was the government's response to the unsolicited bid from September 2015?</text>
        <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000440">3.&amp;#x9;Finally, I understand a new unsolicited proposal has been submitted to the government. Could the minister provide an update on the progress of this proposal?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-02-15T15:14:42" />
        <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000441">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-15T15:14:42" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (15:14):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. I know he has spoken to me about this in the past and I appreciate his advocacy on anything that has the potential for industry and jobs in South Australia. I am advised that Nu-Rock did put in an application to the unsolicited bid proposal. It is a pro forma application where they fill in certain parts of the form. That went through the unsolicited bid proposal and the unsolicited bid team found that the proposal didn't stack up for it to continue as an unsolicited bid.</text>
        <text id="20170215cacd5b9d47cd4fd3b0000442">The unsolicited bid group within government then handed it onto the Investment Attraction agency part of government, who have been and will continue to work with Nu-Rock. I am advised that the pro forma form was filled in for the unsolicited bid proposal but that there has not been anything that constitutes a business case that has been put forward to government yet from Nu-Rock. I will check to see if that has been done since early January when I was last updated about this, but certainly if there was a proposal that was financially viable and stacked up and had independent testing on the ash to see if it was suitable, the government would be more than open to consider it. If there was a proposal that was feasible and stacked up and had a complete business case that could use the ash, then that is something the government would certainly have a look at.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>