<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2017-02-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6003" />
  <endPage num="6067" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Assets Privatisation</name>
      <text id="20170215cb8fb5cf40dc4cd5b0000369">
        <heading>Assets Privatisation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-02-15">
            <name>Assets Privatisation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-02-15T14:59:45" />
        <text id="20170215cb8fb5cf40dc4cd5b0000370">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-15T14:59:45" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (14:59):</by>  Supplementary.</text>
        <text id="20170215cb8fb5cf40dc4cd5b0000371">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20170215cb8fb5cf40dc4cd5b0000372">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! It is totally inappropriate. You have the call. Ask your question and the minister will then answer it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20170215cb8fb5cf40dc4cd5b0000373">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE:</by>  Thank you, sir, for your protection. Supplementary based on the minister's answer regarding privatisation of ETSA: can the minister explain to the house why it is not alright to privatise ETSA when it went through the democratic processes of the parliament and was approved by parliament, yet it is alright for this government to privatise the forestry of South Australia without it going through the democratic process of the parliament? What is the difference, minister?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change</electorate>
        <startTime time="2017-02-15T15:00:36" />
        <text id="20170215cb8fb5cf40dc4cd5b0000374">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-15T15:00:36" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change) (15:00):</by>  The difference is that you lied to the people of South Australia when you were in government and you promised you would never ever sell ETSA. There is a difference: you lied to South Australia.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="599">
        <name>The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20170215cb8fb5cf40dc4cd5b0000375">
          <by role="member" id="599">The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS:</by>  Point of order: I take offence at the minister accusing you of lying, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20170215cb8fb5cf40dc4cd5b0000376">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  Mr President, I withdraw. I was pointing my pen at the Hon. Mr Brokenshire.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="6028" />
        <text id="20170215cb8fb5cf40dc4cd5b0000377">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  We need to use language that is a little bit civilised. I think we should treat each other with respect. The accusation of lying and so forth should be kept away from it. Other words can be used. The Hon. Ms Gago.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>