<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-12-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5907" />
  <endPage num="5963" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Workplace Injury Claims</name>
      <text id="20161207277e3982bb544aee90000390">
        <heading>Police Workplace Injury Claims</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-12-07">
            <name>Police Workplace Injury Claims</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-12-07T14:53:37" />
        <text id="20161207277e3982bb544aee90000391">
          <timeStamp time="2016-12-07T14:53:37" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (14:53):</by>  A supplementary: on the basis of that, what was your department's view when consulted? Secondly, will the minister take on notice the second supplementary question, which was the question about the potential budget or cost impact of the new arrangements compared to the current arrangements?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-12-07">
            <name>Police Workplace Injury Claims</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-12-07T14:53:57" />
        <text id="20161207277e3982bb544aee90000392">
          <timeStamp time="2016-12-07T14:53:57" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:53):</by>  Yes, I am happy to take on notice the question regarding cost implications. It should be noted of course that the proposition is to go from a self-insured arrangement to one where the levy is paid no differently to any other non-government agency. This is simply a question of the government's self-insured status, so the costs associated with going to a registered employer arrangement would be easily recognisable in the form of the levy that is attached to every other employer in the state's wages—the return-to-work levy—but I am more than happy to take that question on notice.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>