<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-12-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5907" />
  <endPage num="5963" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Workplace Injury Claims</name>
      <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000367">
        <heading>Police Workplace Injury Claims</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="599" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-12-07">
            <name>Police Workplace Injury Claims</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-12-07T14:44:00" />
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000368">
          <timeStamp time="2016-12-07T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="599">The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS (14:44):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Police questions regarding the processing of workplace injury claims within SAPOL.</text>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000369">Leave granted. </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="599" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000370">
          <by role="member" id="599">The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS:</by>  I have recently been advised that the Injury Management Section of the Health, Safety &amp; Welfare Branch of SAPOL has been advised that SAPOL will no longer be self-insured and that from mid-2017 work injury claims will be processed externally. In light of that, I was also interested to read in today's <term>Advertiser</term> an opinion piece by Mr Mark Carroll, President of the Police Association, and I quote from a particular part of that opinion piece regarding probationary constables:</text>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000371">
          <inserted>I hope their families and friends will understand and have patience with their inevitable reactions to the stressful, traumatic events that are a necessary part of their service.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000372">
          <inserted>I hope they learn to turn to their workmates. I hope they're smart enough to understand that psychological injuries incurred in the line of duty are as honourable as physical injuries. I hope they're smart enough to know when they need help—and courageous enough to ask for it.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000373">Given these remarks and the advice about the Injury Management Section within SAPOL, my questions are:</text>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000374">1.&amp;#x9;What arrangements will be put in place to cater for injured SAPOL staff who will continue to require case management after the changeover, particularly those suffering from psychological injuries that have occurred in the line of duty?</text>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000375">2.&amp;#x9;What arrangements have been put in place for the staff who are currently responsible for those duties within the Injury Management Section of the Health, Safety &amp; Welfare Branch of SAPOL?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <startTime time="2016-12-07T14:47:15" />
        <page num="5935" />
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000376">
          <timeStamp time="2016-12-07T14:47:15" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:47):</by>  I thank the Hon. Mr Dawkins for his question. I think the bulk of his question really speaks to a reform that has been led by the Minister for Industrial Relations, of course, who is the Deputy Premier in the other place. Parts of the Hon. Mr Dawkins' question will have to be taken on notice and passed on to him. However, there are parts that I think are more pertinent to my responsibilities, which I'm happy to respond to.</text>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000377">The second part of your question, in terms of what is happening to those employees who are currently within SAPOL who have the responsibility of managing workers compensation claims, I am happy to take on notice. I haven't received any advice or seen any correspondence to suggest that any of those workers face termination or anything along those lines, but I'm happy to double-check that and take it on notice.</text>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000378">I think it is important to understand that the government's view is that this transition, or this change in management of workers compensation claims, to the best of my knowledge, is not expected to have any impact on the service delivery of injured workers, although I understand that others might have an alternative view about that, but certainly that is my understanding of the government's position.</text>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000379">Regarding services that are made available to those members of SAPOL who do face concerns, such as conditions like PTSD, SAPOL provide a range of services that go beyond the ordinary entitlements that an employee would have in terms of return to work. For instance, SAPOL does have an employee assistance section, whose job it is to provide services to those employees who have had to deal with traumatic circumstances; for instance, those employees who have attended roadside crashes—something that has certainly been topical during the course of this week and today—or those SAPOL officers who had to endure and perform incredibly difficult tasks during the course of the event that unfolded throughout metropolitan Adelaide and concluded in Hindley Street early last week.</text>
        <text id="201612074a85d9e3ce7241b480000380">Those are examples of circumstances that police officers may have to face which would result in them potentially gaining access to the employee assistance section that exists within SAPOL to provide mental health services and other services to those employees who may be struggling. None of that is changing. Certainly, the government takes very seriously its obligations as an employer to provide decent services to those people within the government's employ who might be subject to a workplace injury.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>