<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-11-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5519" />
  <endPage num="5575" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Service Employees</name>
      <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000114">
        <heading>Public Service Employees</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-17">
            <name>Public Service Employees</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-17T14:27:22" />
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000115">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-17T14:27:22" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (14:27):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation prior to directing questions to the minister representing the Premier on the subject of gifts to public servants and other public officers.</text>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000116">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000117">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  A series of questions to the Minister for Police—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. Wade</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000118">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. Wade:</by>  He couldn't answer them.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000119">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  My colleague says he couldn't answer them. I am sure that interjection is out of order, Mr President.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000120">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Totally out of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000121">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  Indeed, but it is on the record, though. After that out of order interjection, the Minister for Police yesterday, after a series of questions, indicated quite clearly that because a gift given to the wife of the police commissioner wasn't required to be disclosed, he, when invited to do so in relation to whether there were any concerns about that, did not respond in any way to that particular question. The minister's response quite clearly on two or three occasions has been that he just expects the police commissioner to comply with the existing government guidelines.</text>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000122">In relation to the code of ethics for the South Australian public sector issued by the Commissioner for Public Sector Employment, under the heading of 'Acceptance of gifts and benefits', there is the following section:</text>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000123">
          <inserted>Public sector employees will not seek or accept gifts or benefits for themselves or others that could be reasonably perceived as influencing them in the performance of their duties and functions as a public sector employee.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="5523" />
        <text continued="true" id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000124">It then goes on to mention non-pecuniary gifts or benefits as well and that all employees should comply with any policies, etc., in relation to receiving them.</text>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000125">My questions to the minister representing the Premier, who has responsibility for the Commissioner for Public Sector Employment, are:</text>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000126">1.&amp;#x9;When the code of ethics for public sector employees refers to 'Public sector employees will not seek or accept gifts or benefits for themselves or others', does the phrase 'or others' include the wives, husbands or partners of public servants?</text>
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000127">2.&amp;#x9;Is there any requirement under the code of ethics, or any other determination of the Commissioner for Public Sector Employment, that, if the wife, husband or partner of a public sector employee was to receive a gift or benefit, for them to declare or reveal that in any way?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2016-11-17T14:30:09" />
        <text id="201611171f3836f2f7df492c90000128">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-17T14:30:09" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (14:30):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question and his dogged pursuit of everything that he does, and I thank him for his dogged pursuit of his strategies and electoral strategies over the last few decades: it has served us very, very well on this side of the chamber. In relation to his questions, I absolutely agree with my colleague the police minister that I expect that everyone should abide by the rules and conditions of how they are employed in the public sector.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>